Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yaxeen/storytelling-skills --skill wireframe-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yaxeen/storytelling-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yaxeen/storytelling-skills/wireframe-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yaxeen/storytelling-skills/wireframe-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yaxeen/storytelling-skills/wireframe-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yaxeen/storytelling-skills/wireframe-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yaxeen/storytelling-skills/wireframe-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.01106 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00553 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
wireframe-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Wireframe Reviewer
- Reviewing a page = checking whether it tells a clear story that pulls one scroll toward one action.
- Critique against five axes, then return structured findings + a concrete fix for each.
- Built on the six levers — see storytelling-hooks. Recap: 1. Curiosity gap · 2. Emotional mirror · 3. Conflict engine · 4. Relatability · 5. Pattern + surprise · 6. Three-act.
When to Use
- Reviewing a wireframe, mockup, or live landing/sales/home page.
- Diagnosing low conversion, confusing flow, or "it just feels off".
- Giving a designer/marketer structured, actionable feedback.
- Any niche or business. To build a new structure, use wireframe-writer.
The Five Review Axes (Quick Reference)
| Axis | Question | Common failure |
|---|---|---|
| Narrative flow | Does each section earn the next scroll? | Sections in random order; no loop |
| Visual hierarchy | Does the eye land on what matters first? | Everything equal weight; buried CTA |
| Clarity | Is the message understood in 5 seconds? | Vague hero; jargon; feature dump |
| Conversion path | Is there one obvious next action? | Many/competing CTAs; no CTA above fold |
| Friction | What makes a visitor hesitate or leave? | Unanswered objections; cognitive load |
Intake (Before Reviewing)
- A review without context grades against guesses. Know before reviewing: the page's one conversion goal, the target visitor in a sentence, and the main traffic source.
- If these are inferable from the request (a freelancer's services page → goal is inquiries), state your assumptions inline and proceed; only ask first when the goal is genuinely undecidable — don't block a review on intake theater.
Review Process
- 5-second test: Look only at the hero. Can you state what it offers and what to do next? If not, that's finding #1.
- Scroll the arc: Does it move hook → problem → solution → proof → offer → objections → CTA? Note any missing or out-of-order section.
- Score each axis per section (works / weak / missing) — an internal diagnostic pass, not a grid to render in the output.
- Trace the eye: Is hierarchy guiding to headline → value → CTA? Or competing for attention?
- Find the friction: List every reason a visitor hesitates (unanswered question, weak proof, too many choices).
- Write findings: For each issue — what's wrong, why it hurts, the fix.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 80 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A d067d17587b4
wireframe-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository yaxeen/storytelling-skills (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 1,106 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
visual-brand-kit
Create visual identity systems for AI-generated content: colors, typography feel, photography style, composition rules, and prompt presets. Triggers on brand kits, visual guidelines, image style, and brand photography.
self-media-content-brief
A short planning document for deciding what content to make, for whom, on which platform, and with what evidence.
self-media-content-workflow
A general workflow for planning, creating, adapting, reviewing, and archiving social-media content.
self-media-platform-copywriting
A writing workflow for turning an approved topic, evidence, and brief into posts for platforms such as X, Xiaohongshu, WeChat, and short-video apps.
self-media-short-video
A planning and production guide for vertical short videos on platforms such as TikTok, Xiaohongshu, and WeChat Channels.
self-media-wechat-publisher
A publishing workflow that turns approved Markdown into formatted WeChat articles or image posts and saves them as drafts.