Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/api-round-message-groupingnpx skills add ychampion/cskill-agents --skill api-round-message-groupinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ychampion/cskill-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/api-round-message-grouping)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/api-round-message-grouping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/api-round-message-grouping.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00424 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00212 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00085 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
api-round-message-grouping scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 29 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SKILL: API Round Message Grouping
Domain: context-management Trigger: When compacting or retrying requests, use API-round boundaries instead of human-turn heuristics to determine what past messages belong together. Source Pattern: Distilled from reviewed session memory, compaction, and context-budgeting implementations.
Core Method
Walk the message stream and emit a new bucket every time a fresh assistant message with a new message id starts. This respects the API contract that all tool results complete before the next assistant response, so each bucket represents exactly one API round-trip; malformed conversations still fall through because the grouping only fires when a real assistant boundary appears. Downstream compaction retries can then drop or replay whole rounds without breaking tool-result pairing.
Key Rules
- Track the last assistant message id and start a new group only when it changes while at least one message is already buffered.
- Push the final bucket at the end so the last API round isn’t lost.
- Do not split mid-assistant stream (IDs stay constant across streaming chunks), keeping each API response intact.
- Let dangling tool uses remain in the same group rather than inventing extra boundaries; downstream helpers (ensureToolResultPairing) repair them only when needed.
- Name each bucket explicitly when logging so retry diagnostics can report the round that triggered the fallback.
Example Application
When a compaction attempt hits prompt-too-long, first group the transcript into API rounds, identify the round that introduced the oversized assistant response, and drop or compact only that round before retrying.
Anti-Patterns (What NOT to do)
- Do not group by user turns or by time because API chunks can span multiple user messages and tool results.
- Do not start a new group on every assistant chunk; the streaming assistant may emit multiple chunks with the same
id, and splitting them would leave incomplete tool-result pairs.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 29 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 8ad26562a02d
api-round-message-grouping is a skill published in the GitHub repository ychampion/cskill-agents (36 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 424 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
rpce-merge-pr-batch
Safely process an explicitly ordered batch of RepoPrompt CE pull requests end to end: preserve a dirty original checkout, isolate each PR in an external disposable worktree, use window- and context-scoped CE rpce-cli Agent Mode review, repair and validate, require exact-head hosted checks, merge with merge commits…
rpce-test-quality
Select, design, review, consolidate, or remove RepoPrompt CE tests, diagnostic harnesses, and smoke checks by regression value and maintenance cost. Use when the task centers on test, diagnostic, or smoke coverage, including whether a single regression test is worth committing. Do not use for feature or bug-fix work…
rpce-contribution-check
Validate RepoPrompt CE contributions before committing or pushing. Use whenever an agent is about to create a commit, push the current branch, rewrite history, delete a branch or fork, or change GitHub-visible repository state. Enforces staged-index and outgoing-range secret scanning, repository guardrails, clean push…
rpce-release
Build or publish RepoPrompt CE release artifacts using the repository release scripts and GitHub workflows.
rpce-maintainer-guidance
Apply evidence-led RepoPrompt CE maintainership principles distilled from documented project guidance. Use when planning, scoping, implementing, reviewing, triaging, or sequencing RPCE changes; deciding whether work should be an investigation, issue, PR, or follow-up; checking compatibility, migrations, performance…
rpce-swift-6-concurrency-migration
Plan, inventory, stage, execute, or review RepoPrompt CE's project-wide migration to Swift 6.2 concurrency checking and Swift 6 language mode. Use when auditing packages, targets, settings, diagnostics, unsafe escape hatches, migration phases, blockers, or validation evidence across the root and provider packages. Do…