Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ychampion/cskill-agents --skill autocompact-recursion-guardsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ychampion/cskill-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/autocompact-recursion-guards)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/autocompact-recursion-guards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/autocompact-recursion-guards/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/autocompact-recursion-guards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/autocompact-recursion-guards.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00442 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00177 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
autocompact-recursion-guards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 29 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SKILL: Autocompact Recursion Guards
Domain: context-management
Trigger: Apply when auto-compacting logic runs inside recursive agents (session memory, compact helpers, context collapse) and must avoid deadlocking by re-entering itself.
Source Pattern: Distilled from reviewed session memory, compaction, and context-budgeting implementations.
Core Method
Protect the proactive compaction gate with explicit exclusion rules for forked agents and context-specialized modes. Check whether the caller is already within the session_memory or compact subagent, whether a context-collapse or reactive-only mode is engaged, and whether features that manage their own context already control compaction. If any guard trips, return false so the recursion never fires again and the specialized agent can manage its own compaction cycle.
Key Rules
- Identify contexts that already own compaction (session memory, compact, marble_origami, reactive compact, context collapse) and short-circuit the auto-compact decision for them.
- Keep the guards in should auto compact separate from the general thresholds so the recursion detection stays runnable even when feature flags change.
- Use feature gates to keep these checks dead-code-eliminated in builds that lack the implicated subsystems.
- Document why each guard exists so future engineers do not re-enable auto-compact in those contexts.
- Log or metrics may note when a guard prevented compaction so you can tune thresholds without reintroducing loops.
Example Application
When a forked session-memory compactor would otherwise trigger auto-compact, the guard sees query source 'session memory' and returns false, letting the fork run its own compaction without conflicting with the main thread.
Anti-Patterns (What NOT to do)
- Don’t let auto-compact run inside the compact agent or session memory; it will deadlock with itself.
- Don’t tie these guards to mutable thresholds; they must fire even when the token usage looks high.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A b19804275afc
autocompact-recursion-guards is a skill published in the GitHub repository ychampion/cskill-agents (36 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 442 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
grape
Use Grape MCP for Codex context continuity in coding repositories. Use when a task needs repeated-turn context, omitted context restore, stale-context checks, invalidation checks, or safe continuity across branch and dirty-worktree changes.
gh
GitHub CLI skill for interacting with GitHub via the gh command line tool. Use when Bub needs to (1) Create, view, or manage GitHub repositories, (2) Work with issues and pull requests, (3) Create and manage releases, (4) Run and monitor GitHub Actions workflows, (5) Create and manage gists, (6) Install and manage…
brain-ingest
The process for digesting a conversation, document, or research result, classifying it, and writing it down as brain content (a root-page update or a new/updated page) through the brain CLI.
wish
Deliver one decided task end to end — admit it, work it in one worktree, gate, independent review, bounded repair, a merge-ready PR — or plan a multi-group wish when it is bigger than one task.
gate-control
Canonical VideoStudio review authorization and state-transition policy. Use after any Gate B/C/Preview/D decision, post-gate revision, resumed approval, or exhausted visual-QA result across COMPOSE/AUTO/GENERATE/EDIT; maps explicit user authority and durable artifact state to one next action with ovs gate transition.…
report
Investigate a failure to its root cause with grounded evidence, hand the diagnosis to fix, and create a GitHub issue only when asked.