Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ychampion/cskill-agents --skill plan-mode-permission-gatinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ychampion/cskill-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/plan-mode-permission-gating)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/plan-mode-permission-gating"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/plan-mode-permission-gating/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/plan-mode-permission-gating"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ychampion/cskill-agents/plan-mode-permission-gating.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00386 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00154 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
plan-mode-permission-gating scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
SKILL: Plan Mode Permission Gating
Domain: permission-gating Trigger: Invoke when the user wants to enter plan mode or a complex implementation requires additional permission scrutiny before introducing file edits. Source Pattern: Distilled from reviewed plan-mode entry and permission-transition implementations.
Core Method
Wrap plan-mode entry in an explicit permission transition. Validate that the request comes from the root session, switch the shared permission context into a planning state, and emit a standardized banner that reminds agents to explore before editing. Centralizing that transition prevents individual call sites from bypassing the plan-mode contract or drifting into edits before planning is complete.
Key Rules
- Treat plan-mode entry as a read-only permission change that cannot be invoked inside a child-agent context.
- Reconfigure the shared permission context through one centralized transition path so state sync and side effects stay consistent.
- Return a human-facing banner describing the plan-mode obligations, and let follow-up instructions adapt to the active plan-mode variant.
- Keep the tool’s UI payload minimal but explicit about the no-edit rule; reuse the same instructions for both regular and interview-enhanced plan mode.
Example Application
Use this skill when a CLI state machine detects a non-trivial refactor request: enter plan mode first, flip the session into a no-edit planning state, and require a reviewed plan before touching files.
Anti-Patterns (What NOT to do)
- Don’t let a code path change permissions directly without the standardized transition, or some agents will edge into edits without the plan-mode reminder.
- Don’t ignore agent forks — the gate belongs only to the root session, so refuse plan-mode tool calls when
context.agentIdis set.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 0c838f21c976
plan-mode-permission-gating is a skill published in the GitHub repository ychampion/cskill-agents (36 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 386 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
grape
Use Grape MCP for Codex context continuity in coding repositories. Use when a task needs repeated-turn context, omitted context restore, stale-context checks, invalidation checks, or safe continuity across branch and dirty-worktree changes.
gh
GitHub CLI skill for interacting with GitHub via the gh command line tool. Use when Bub needs to (1) Create, view, or manage GitHub repositories, (2) Work with issues and pull requests, (3) Create and manage releases, (4) Run and monitor GitHub Actions workflows, (5) Create and manage gists, (6) Install and manage…
brain-ingest
The process for digesting a conversation, document, or research result, classifying it, and writing it down as brain content (a root-page update or a new/updated page) through the brain CLI.
wish
Deliver one decided task end to end — admit it, work it in one worktree, gate, independent review, bounded repair, a merge-ready PR — or plan a multi-group wish when it is bigger than one task.
gate-control
Canonical VideoStudio review authorization and state-transition policy. Use after any Gate B/C/Preview/D decision, post-gate revision, resumed approval, or exhausted visual-QA result across COMPOSE/AUTO/GENERATE/EDIT; maps explicit user authority and durable artifact state to one next action with ovs gate transition.…
report
Investigate a failure to its root cause with grounded evidence, hand the diagnosis to fix, and create a GitHub issue only when asked.