Oh My Claude Code is a multi-agent orchestration system for Claude Code, coordinating specialized agents, commands, skills, hooks, and workflows. It is designed for developers who want Claude Code to handle coding tasks through coordinated agent roles. Catalogue entries are components of its Claude Code workflow, including agents, commands, skills, hooks, instructions, MCP configuration, and a plugin.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill harborgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/harbor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/harbor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/harbor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/harbor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/harbor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.03741 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.01870 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00748 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00374 |
Grade A, and why
harbor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 162 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Harbor
Harbor is the shipyard's intake. External requests — issues, bug reports, feature requests, and (when enabled) external PRs — arrive as raw noise. Harbor turns that noise into evidence, proposals, signed decisions, and authorized executions, so that the captain only ever handles what is genuinely unresolved: a new tradeoff, a new exception, a new authority.
Success order. First: zero overreach — nothing happens that nobody authorized. Second: fewer captain judgments and less reading — without skipping ships, auto-rejecting, or parking forever.
The four records
Every harbor action produces one of four records. They are kept in the tracker itself (comments, labels, links) — the tracker is the only record source; the docket is an index, not a store.
| Record | Minimal content |
|---|---|
| Verification (evidence) | link to the issue/PR and relevant comments; inspection time; head/base or target version; command or method; actual result; what was not verified and why it matters |
| Proposal | one explicit question; recommendation and alternative; the exact object set in scope; scope and non-goals; linked evidence; the proposed action; link to harbor's own comment |
| Decision | the authorizing party and a verifiable source; what was decided; link to the signed proposal; applicable conditions; allowed actions; which prior decision it follows or supersedes |
| Execution result | reference to the authorization and the input version; what was actually done; failures or unknown outcomes; next responsible party if any. Receipt links must reference verified, existing tracker comments — a draft's ID is not a receipt; verify the comment exists before citing it |
Not every record is its own comment: one consolidated verification comment may cover a sweep, and a decision may carry a combined execution receipt. When a signed proposal materially changes, post a new snapshot that names what it supersedes — never silently edit what was signed. If a cited source comment is later edited, re-verify validity before relying on it; tracker comments are not immutable storage.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 162 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A c81707042d13
harbor is a skill published in the GitHub repository Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode (39,107 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 3,741 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
Other skills, from other repositories
great_cto
Use when the CTO describes a feature, task, or project goal. Orchestrates the full SDLC pipeline automatically based on project type.
github-triage
Read-only GitHub triage for issues AND PRs. 1 item = 1 background task (category: quick). Analyzes all open items and writes evidence-backed reports to /tmp/{datetime}/. Every claim requires a GitHub permalink as proof. NEVER takes any action on GitHub - no comments, no merges, no closes, no labels. Reports only.…
opportunity-solution-tree
Build an Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) to structure product discovery — map a desired outcome to customer opportunities, possible solutions, and experiments. Based on Teresa Torres' Continuous Discovery Habits. Use when the team is unclear what to build next, when multiple opportunities compete, or before writing a…
done-blocked
Reusable reporting contract for any agent that hands work back to the pipeline. Forces ONE of two terminal statuses (DONE or BLOCKED) with a specific evidence shape. Stops vague "probably finished" and "kind of stuck" verdicts.
outcome-roadmap
Transform an output-focused roadmap (feature list) into an outcome-focused one. Rewrites initiatives as outcome statements reflecting user and business impact. Use when a roadmap lists features instead of results, when making a roadmap more strategic, or when communicating what success looks like vs what will be built.
pm-planning
Decomposition methodology for pm agent — turns an approved ARCH document into a Beads task list with explicit dependencies, time-boxes, and acceptance criteria. The pipeline can only orchestrate work it can see; this skill defines what "seeable work" looks like.