Oh My Claude Code is a multi-agent orchestration system for Claude Code, coordinating specialized agents, commands, skills, hooks, and workflows. It is designed for developers who want Claude Code to handle coding tasks through coordinated agent roles. Catalogue entries are components of its Claude Code workflow, including agents, commands, skills, hooks, instructions, MCP configuration, and a plugin.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00230 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00092 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00046 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Verify
Use this skill when the user wants confidence that a feature, fix, or refactor actually works.
Goal
Turn vague “it should work” claims into concrete evidence.
Workflow
- Identify the exact behavior that must be proven.
- Prefer existing tests first.
- If coverage is missing, run the narrowest direct verification commands available.
- If direct automation is not enough, describe the manual validation steps and gather concrete observable evidence.
- Report only what was actually verified.
Verification order
- Existing tests
- Typecheck / build
- Narrow direct command checks
- Manual or interactive validation
Rules
- Do not say a change is complete without evidence.
- If a check fails, include the failure clearly.
- If no realistic verification path exists, say that explicitly instead of bluffing.
- Prefer concise evidence summaries over noisy logs.
Output
- What was verified
- Which commands/tests were run
- What passed
- What failed or remains unverified
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 6cd36805efb8
verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode (40,265 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 230 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
oracle-debug
Disciplined debugging methodology. Triggers on bug reports, test failures, "debug this", "diagnose this", unexpected behavior, build failures, integration issues, or performance regressions. Find root cause before a permanent corrective fix; contain urgent harm safely first.
testing-debugging
Testing and debugging for Zephyr RTOS. Covers the Ztest framework for unit and integration tests, the Twister test runner for automated HIL/SIM validation, and advanced tracing/debugging techniques (SystemView, Thread Analyzer, Stack analysis). Trigger when writing unit tests, setting up CI/CD pipelines, or analyzing…
to-fix
Phase 5 of the Pólya Heuristic Coder: First-Principles Bug Remediation, Seam Tracing, Bisection Search (O(log n)), Failing Reproduction Tests, and Incubation Circuit-Breaker Gate (docs/bug-reports/{slug}-bugfix.md).
test-value
Improve test value and feedback cost when auditing slow, flaky, redundant or brittle tests; choosing tests during implementation; or reviewing test changes before a commit or PR. Keep ordinary implementation and pre-commit use scoped to the affected behavior, not a repository-wide audit.
testing-blocks
Use this when you have made AEM Edge Delivery Services code changes to blocks, scripts, or styles and need to validate them before opening a pull request. Covers unit testing for utilities and logic, browser testing with Playwright, linting, and guidance on what to test and how.
dart-downstream-fix
DART Downstream Fix: fix a DART bug reported through gz-physics or Gazebo.