Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill bigquery-cost-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yeaight7/agent-powerupsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yeaight7/agent-powerups/bigquery-cost-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yeaight7/agent-powerups/bigquery-cost-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yeaight7/agent-powerups/bigquery-cost-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yeaight7/agent-powerups/bigquery-cost-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yeaight7/agent-powerups/bigquery-cost-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00934 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00467 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
bigquery-cost-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
BigQuery Cost Audit
When to Use
- Reviewing BigQuery query costs, failure patterns, or performance inefficiencies.
- Identifying which jobs, users, or projects are driving the highest spend.
- Preparing optimization recommendations for an engineering or cost-review meeting.
- Auditing governance: scheduled jobs, duplicated logic, or low-value recurring queries.
Goals
- Identify the main cost drivers by job, project, and user.
- Detect repeated waste patterns (full scans, failed retries, duplicated logic).
- Suggest realistic optimizations with estimated impact.
- Translate technical waste into business-language findings.
What to Inspect
Cost hotspots
-- Top 20 most expensive jobs in the past 7 days
SELECT
job_id, user_email, query,
total_bytes_processed / POW(1024, 4) AS tb_processed,
ROUND(total_bytes_processed / POW(1024, 4) * 6.25, 2) AS estimated_cost_usd,
creation_time
FROM `region-us`.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.JOBS
WHERE creation_time > TIMESTAMP_SUB(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(), INTERVAL 7 DAY)
AND job_type = 'QUERY'
AND state = 'DONE'
ORDER BY total_bytes_processed DESC
LIMIT 20;
Repeated failures
SELECT
error_result.reason, COUNT(*) AS failure_count, user_email,
ANY_VALUE(query) AS sample_query
FROM `region-us`.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.JOBS
WHERE creation_time > TIMESTAMP_SUB(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(), INTERVAL 7 DAY)
AND error_result IS NOT NULL
GROUP BY error_result.reason, user_email
ORDER BY failure_count DESC;
Missing partition pruning
Look for queries that scan full tables despite available partition columns:
- No
WHEREfilter on the partition column. _PARTITIONTIMEor_PARTITIONDATEnot in the filter.LIMITused without a partition filter (does not reduce scan cost).
Missing clustering
Check high-scan queries that filter on non-clustered columns after partitioning is already in place.
Scheduled jobs with low value
-- Find scheduled queries with high scan volume (via Data Transfer Service run history)
-- Note: scheduled query metadata lives in region-specific transfer_run tables.
-- Substitute your project and region:
SELECT
config.display_name,
run.state,
run.end_time,
run.error_status
FROM `<project>.<region>.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.SCHEDULED_QUERY_RUNS` AS run
JOIN `<project>.<region>.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.SCHEDULED_QUERIES` AS config
ON run.scheduled_query_id = config.scheduled_query_id
WHERE run.end_time > TIMESTAMP_SUB(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(), INTERVAL 30 DAY)
ORDER BY config.display_name, run.end_time DESC;
-- Then cross-reference with JOBS to find per-run bytes_processed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 104 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A fa001115a973
bigquery-cost-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository yeaight7/agent-powerups (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 934 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-authoring
Author SKILL.md: frontmatter, structure, writing principles.
systematic-debugging
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.
github-code-review
Review PRs: diffs, inline comments via gh or REST.
requesting-code-review
Pre-commit review: security scan, quality gates, auto-fix.
simplify-code
Sequential 3-lens cleanup of recent code changes.
test-driven-development
TDD: enforce RED-GREEN-REFACTOR, tests before code.