Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor --skill code-simplifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/code-simplifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/code-simplifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/code-simplifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00844 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00338 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00169 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
code-simplifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Simplifier
Always active. Apply these rules to every piece of code written or reviewed.
Rules
1. No Speculative Abstractions
Solve today's problem. Do not build for hypothetical future requirements.
❌ Bad:
interface DataProcessor<T, R> {
process(data: T): R;
validate(data: T): boolean;
}
✅ Good:
function parseUserInput(raw: string): User { ... }
2. No Premature Layers
Add a layer only when it carries real logic — not to "separate concerns" theoretically.
❌ Bad:
class UserRepository {
constructor(private db: UserDataAccessLayer) {}
findById(id: string) { return this.db.findById(id); }
}
✅ Good:
async function getUserById(db: Database, id: string): Promise<User> {
return db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?', [id]);
}
3. No Single-Implementation Interfaces
Don't create an interface for a type that will only ever have one implementation.
❌ Bad: interface Logger { log(msg: string): void }
✅ Good: Use the class directly, or a plain function.
4. Functions Do One Thing (Max 30 Lines)
If a function needs a comment to describe what a section does, that section should be its own function.
5. No Defensive Code for Impossible Cases
Don't validate inputs that can't be wrong (internal calls, typed parameters, framework guarantees).
❌ Bad:
function add(a: number, b: number): number {
if (typeof a !== 'number') throw new Error('a must be a number');
return a + b;
}
✅ Good:
function add(a: number, b: number): number {
return a + b;
}
6. No Design Patterns by Default
Use a pattern only when it solves a specific pain you have today.
7. Flat Over Nested
Use guard clauses and early returns instead of nesting.
❌ Bad:
function process(user: User | null) {
if (user) {
if (user.isActive) {
if (user.hasPermission) {
doWork(user);
}
}
}
}
✅ Good:
function process(user: User | null) {
if (!user) return;
if (!user.isActive) return;
if (!user.hasPermission) return;
doWork(user);
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 131 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 5d51d76b4aa0
code-simplifier is a skill published in the GitHub repository yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 844 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-23.
Other skills, from other repositories
architecture-compass
Architectural thinking partner for an existing repository — scans the codebase, conducts a structured interview, agrees on current architectural state and recommended direction, and produces a shareable insights document. Scoped to one repository, module, or folder. Does not execute transformation — it orients. Use…
review-refiner
Facilitate a structured conversation to customize how the review molecule works -- atom loading rules, severity classification, report format, scope rules, insight capture, and health logging. Produces a formal review-standards.md document that the review molecule will use as its process configuration. Use when the…
review
Perform a structured code review by composing validation checklists from relevant atoms based on what code changed. Loads atoms conditionally -- clean-code always, architecture/DDD/security/tests only when the delta touches their domain. Produces a severity-ordered report with specific locations and fixes. Use when…
ocr
AI-powered multi-agent code review. Simulates a team of Principal Engineers reviewing code from different perspectives. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, analyze changes, or perform code review.
OCR Review-to-Approval Loop
Drive a PR to an approved code review by looping OCR's multi-agent review and address steps. Runs /ocr:review then /ocr:address repeatedly until the review verdict is APPROVE, then one final /ocr:address for leftover suggestions, posting every review and every address round to the GitHub PR as comments. Use when the…
code-standards
Apply a disciplined engineering workflow to any code change. Use whenever implementing a feature, fixing a bug, or refactoring — before writing code, not after. Walks orient → baseline → smallest change → test → verify → self-review, and enforces language-agnostic hard gates (don't mass-reformat, keep the linter and…