Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yimwoo/hotl-plugin --skill pr-reviewinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yimwoo/hotl-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yimwoo/hotl-plugin/pr-reviewing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yimwoo/hotl-plugin/pr-reviewing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yimwoo/hotl-plugin/pr-reviewing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yimwoo/hotl-plugin/pr-reviewing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yimwoo/hotl-plugin/pr-reviewing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.02842 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.01137 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00568 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00284 |
Grade A, and why
pr-reviewing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 325 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
HOTL PR Review
Overview
Review a pull request end-to-end across 4 dimensions (description/ticket, code changes, code scan, unit tests) using parallel subagents. Produces a structured verdict report and optionally posts line-level comments on GitHub.
Announce: "Starting PR review. Detecting platform and fetching PR data..."
Output Contract
This skill produces a structured review report. The canonical schema is defined in
docs/contracts/pr-review-output.md. All platforms must emit every section in that
contract. Platform-specific rendering (tables, inline comments, etc.) is handled by
platform docs, not this skill.
Key rules from the contract:
- All 9 sections always present, even on BLOCK
- Dimension verdicts summarize sections; individual findings may have mixed severities
- Overall verdict derived from dimension verdicts, not individual findings
- The contract is mandatory even when platform-native findings are emitted before it
Step 1: Platform Detection & PR Fetching
Resolve the PR
- If the user provided a PR URL → parse org/repo and PR number from it
- If no URL → detect from current branch:
- Try
gh pr view --json number,title,body,baseRefName,headRefName,url→ if succeeds, use GitHub mode - Try
glab mr view→ if succeeds, use GitLab mode - If both fail → use local-only mode (git diff against base branch)
- Try
Platform Modes
| Platform | CLI | Mode | Capabilities |
|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub (public) | gh |
full | Local report + post review comments |
| GitLab | glab |
local-only | Local report only |
| Enterprise/VPN | none | local-only | Local report only (git diff fallback) |
Fetch PR Data
Full mode (GitHub):
gh pr view <number> --json title,body,baseRefName,headRefName,changedFiles,additions,deletions
gh pr diff <number>
GitLab mode:
glab mr view <number>
glab mr diff <number>
Local-only fallback:
git log --oneline main..HEAD
git diff main...HEAD
git diff --name-only main...HEAD
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 325 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 74566b343002
pr-reviewing is a skill published in the GitHub repository yimwoo/hotl-plugin (27 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 2,842 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
git-review
Review a repository diff for accidental changes, secrets, generated files, dependency and migration impact, tests, documentation, and scope before completion.
autofix-pr
Watch a pull request and fix it from a worktree of its own - CI failures, review feedback from trusted authors and merge conflicts are fixed, pushed to the PR branch and answered on the PR under the user's git and gh identity. Usage - /autofix-pr [ | ] [--once] [--every ] [--no-reply] [--yes] [instructions]…
triage
Gatekeep and review GitHub issues and pull requests for Qwen Code maintainers. Use for GitHub Action issue triage, PR admission checks, product-direction review, KISS-focused PR review, and staged bilingual GitHub comments.
gentle-ai-collab-perfect
Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the…
branch-pr
Create Gentle AI pull requests with issue-first checks. Trigger: creating, opening, or preparing PRs for review.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.