Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yinqd3/workbuddy-skills --skill academic-paper-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yinqd3/workbuddy-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/academic-paper-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/academic-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/academic-paper-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/academic-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/academic-paper-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00120 | $0.01227 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00613 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00245 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
academic-paper-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Academic Paper Reviewer — 多视角学术论文同行评审
模拟完整的国际期刊同行评审流程：自动识别论文学科，动态配置 7 名审稿人，从四个非重叠视角进行评审，最终输出结构化编辑决策和修改路线图。
快速开始
评审这篇论文：[粘贴论文或提供文件路径]
6 种评审模式
| 模式 | 适用场景 |
|---|---|
full |
投稿前全面评审（默认） |
re-review |
检查修改是否回应了评审意见 |
quick |
快速质量评估（~15 分钟） |
methodology-focus |
只关注方法/统计 |
guided |
苏格拉底式引导评审（学习者模式） |
calibration |
校准模式：测量审稿人 FNR/FPR 再信任评分 |
Agent 团队（7 个）
| # | Agent | 角色 | 阶段 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 领域分析 Agent | 分析论文学科，动态配置 7 名审稿人身份 | 阶段 0 |
| 2 | EIC Agent | 期刊主编——期刊匹配度、原创性、整体质量、终审决定 | 阶段 1 |
| 3 | 方法论审稿 Agent | 审稿人 1——研究设计、统计有效性、可重复性 | 阶段 1 |
| 4 | 领域审稿 Agent | 审稿人 2——文献覆盖、理论框架、领域贡献 | 阶段 1 |
| 5 | 视角审稿 Agent | 审稿人 3——跨学科联系、实际影响、挑战基本假设 | 阶段 1 |
| 6 | 魔鬼代言 Agent | 挑战核心论点、逻辑谬误检测、最强反论证 | 阶段 1 |
| 7 | 编辑综合 Agent | 综合所有评审、识别共识与分歧、做出编辑决策 | 阶段 2 |
3 阶段工作流
阶段 0: 领域分析与角色配置
+-> [领域分析 Agent] → 审稿人配置卡 (×7)
- 读取完整论文
- 识别：主学科、辅学科、研究范式、方法论类型、目标期刊级别
- 动态生成 7 名审稿人身份：
* EIC: 哪本期刊的编辑，专长领域，审稿偏好
* 审稿人 1: 方法论专长，重点关注什么
* 审稿人 2: 领域专长，研究兴趣
* 审稿人 3: 跨学科视角，独特视角
* 魔鬼代言: 核心攻击策略
阶段 1: 并行评审
+-> [5 名审稿人 + 魔鬼代言] 并行评审
- 每人从不同视角评审
- 0-100 分质量评分
- 详细逐条评论
阶段 2: 编辑决策
+-> [编辑综合 Agent] → 编辑决策信 + 修改路线图
- 综合所有评审
- 识别共识和分歧
- 编辑决定：接受/小修/大修/拒绝
- 生成结构化修改路线图
评审维度
| 维度 | 评估内容 |
|---|---|
| 原创性 | 研究问题的新颖性、视角的独特性 |
| 严谨性 | 方法论适当性、统计分析正确性 |
| 完整性 | 文献覆盖、讨论的深度 |
| 清晰性 | 写作质量、组织结构、图表质量 |
| 贡献 | 对领域的理论/实践贡献 |
魔鬼代言特别任务
- 挑战论文的每个核心论点
- 检测逻辑谬误
- 提出最强替代解释
- 确认偏误检查
- "如果这篇论文的结论是错的，最可能的原因是什么？"
再评审模式
用于验证作者是否充分回应了审稿意见：
- 逐条检查原始评审意见
- 评估修改是否解决了问题
- 新的质量问题标记
- 修改充分性评分
输出
- 5 份独立评审报告（每份从不同视角）
- 1 份魔鬼代言挑战报告
- 1 份编辑决策信 + 结构化修改路线图
- 质量评分矩阵
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 100 lines · 120 tokens per session scan A 22cd097e6eb0
academic-paper-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository yinqd3/workbuddy-skills (6 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 120 tokens to every session and 1,227 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
context7-mcp
This skill should be used when the user asks about libraries, frameworks, API references, or needs code examples. Activates for setup questions, code generation involving libraries, or mentions of specific frameworks like React, Vue, Next.js, Prisma, Supabase, etc.
html-ppt-zhangzara-vellum
A humanities lecture: how Renaissance linear perspective reshaped early cartography — sources, argument, and evidence. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for faculty, graduate seminar.
cangjie-skill
A process for turning a book, course, podcast, interview, long video, or other long material into reusable instructions for an AI agent. It extracts methods and principles, checks them, and packages them as skills.
reading-metaskill
A reading and learning guide based on building a regular reading habit, choosing books, and understanding difficult subjects through original works and explanation.
life-meaning
A guide for reflecting on personal purpose, effort, suffering, and mortality when life feels empty or directionless.
principal-agent
A Chinese-language guide based on the principal-agent idea: the person who owns a decision or its result may have different incentives from someone acting on another person's behalf. It applies this lens to jobs, companies, and partnerships.