Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yinqd3/workbuddy-skills --skill academic-pipelinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yinqd3/workbuddy-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/academic-pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/academic-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/academic-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/academic-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/academic-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00109 | $0.01031 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00515 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
academic-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Academic Pipeline — 完整学术研究工作流编排器
轻量级编排器，管理从研究探索到最终稿件的完整学术管线。它不执行实质性工作——只检测阶段、推荐模式、派发技能、管理过渡、跟踪状态。
快速开始
从头开始：
我想写一篇关于生物凝胶固定化强化厌氧消化的研究论文
论文已有，需要修改：
我已有一篇论文，帮我评审和修改
触发条件
用户意图涵盖完整的论文产出流程，而非单一功能需求时触发。
不触发：
- 只需要查资料/文献综述 → 直接用
deep-research - 只需要写论文 → 直接用
academic-paper - 只需要审稿 → 直接用
academic-paper-reviewer - 只需要检查引文 → 直接用
academic-paper的 citation-check 模式
10 阶段管线
| 阶段 | 名称 | 调用的技能 | 可用模式 | 产出物 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 研究选题 | deep-research |
socratic, full, quick | 研究问题简报、方法论蓝本 |
| 2 | 论文写作 | academic-paper |
plan, full | 论文初稿 |
| 2.5 | 完整性检查 | 完整性验证 Agent | — | 完整性报告（引文、数据、统计） |
| 3 | 同行评审 | academic-paper-reviewer |
full | EIC + 3 审稿 + 魔鬼代言报告 |
| 3' | 作者回应 | 用户手动 | — | 逐条回应每一条评审意见 |
| 4 | 修改 | academic-paper |
revision | 修改后稿件 |
| 4.5 | 最终完整性检查 | 完整性验证 Agent | — | 最终完整性报告 |
| 5 | 再评审 | academic-paper-reviewer |
re-review | 修改验证报告 |
| 6 | 最终修改 | academic-paper |
revision | 最终稿 |
| 输出 | 材料包 | 格式化 Agent | format-convert | 投稿包（论文+图表+回信） |
完整性验证协议（阶段 2.5 和 4.5）
7 种 AI 研究失败模式检查：
- 实现 Bug — 代码错误导致结果偏差
- 幻觉结果 — 不存在的引用、编造的数据
- 捷径依赖 — 未经验证的简化假设
- Bug 即洞见 — 错误结果被重构成"发现"
- 方法论编造 — 声称使用了实际未用的方法
- 框架锁定 — 已有框架限制分析视角
- 引文幻觉 — 不存在的参考文献
验证内容：
- 100% 引文核验（每一条参考文献真实存在并可检索）
- 数据一致性检查
- 统计报告标准合规检查
- 声明-证据链完整性
工作流推进规则
- 每个阶段完成后，暂停并提示用户确认
- 只有用户明确批准后才能进入下一阶段
- 用户可随时查看管线状态
- 完整性检查未通过 → 不能进入评审
管线状态仪表盘
可随时请求查看：
当前阶段: [阶段号]
已完成: [阶段列表]
下一步: [下阶段名称 + 推荐模式]
质量门禁: [通过/未通过]
Material Passport（可选）
论文的"材料护照"——记录全流程关键产物和决策：
- 研究问题简报
- 文献检索策略
- 评审意见与回应
- 完整性报告
- 修改记录
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 90 lines · 109 tokens per session scan A b90847780c3d
academic-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository yinqd3/workbuddy-skills (6 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 109 tokens to every session and 1,031 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
results-report
A workflow for turning completed experiment analyses into a structured research report with findings, limitations, failures, and next steps.
math-unicode
Use whenever you need to express mathematical notation — equations, filters, set-builder, statistics, calculus, logic, ratios, drops, counts. Emit Unicode math glyphs INLINE; never wrap in $…$, \(...\), or $$...$$. Terminal coding agents (Claude Code, Codex CLI, and others) do not render LaTeX, so raw delimiters…
obsidian-markdown
Obsidian Flavored Markdown syntax reference — wikilinks, embeds, callouts, properties/frontmatter, tags, comments, block IDs. Use when creating or editing .md files in an Obsidian vault, when linking or embedding notes, when writing callouts or note frontmatter, or when the user mentions wikilinks, backlinks, block…
obsidian-docs
Create comprehensive technical documentation following Obsidian conventions with bidirectional linking, proper folder structure, templates, and developer-focused content. Use when creating documentation, READMEs, wikis, knowledge bases, ADRs, runbooks, or any technical writing. Triggers on: documentation, docs…
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
skill-creator
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.