Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/yohey-w/codd-dev/codd-propagatenpx skills add yohey-w/codd-dev --skill codd-propagategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yohey-w/codd-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yohey-w/codd-dev/codd-propagate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yohey-w/codd-dev/codd-propagate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yohey-w/codd-dev/codd-propagate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00053 | $0.01269 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00634 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00254 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
codd-propagate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 158 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CoDD Propagate
Reverse-propagate source code changes to design documents. When source code changes, codd propagate identifies which design docs are affected via the modules field and optionally updates them using AI.
When to Use
- After modifying source code and before committing
- When you want to check which design docs are affected by code changes
- When you want to auto-update design docs to reflect code changes
- As part of the modification flow (code changed → propagate → review → commit)
Do NOT use this for:
- Document-to-document propagation — use
/codd-impactinstead - Initial design doc generation — use
/codd-generate(greenfield) or/codd-restore(brownfield)
Propagation Direction
CoDD supports two propagation directions:
| Direction | Command | Trigger | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward (doc → doc) | codd impact |
Design doc changed | CEG dependency graph (depends_on) |
| Reverse (code → doc) | codd propagate |
Source code changed | modules field in frontmatter |
/codd-propagate handles the reverse direction only.
How It Works
git diff HEAD # 1. Detect changed source files
↓
source_dirs mapping # 2. Map files to modules (e.g. src/auth/service.py → "auth")
↓
modules field lookup # 3. Find design docs with matching modules
↓
Analysis report # 4. Show which docs need attention
↓ (--update only)
AI update # 5. AI updates affected doc bodies
Prerequisite Checks
Before running propagate, verify:
codd/codd.yamlexists withsource_dirsconfigured inscan.- Design docs have
modulesfield in their frontmatter. - There are uncommitted source code changes (or specify
--difftarget). - Confirm you are in the intended project root.
If modules fields are missing, run codd plan --init to regenerate wave_config with modules, then regenerate or restore design docs.
Recommended Workflow
Analysis Only (Default)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 158 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A ed4514d00a32
codd-propagate is a skill published in the GitHub repository yohey-w/codd-dev (114 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,269 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…