competitive-analysis

competitive-analysis is a skill for Claude Code from yonatangross/orchestkit. It costs 58 tokens per session (1,329 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of frameworks for studying competitors, industry forces, internal strengths and weaknesses, and gaps between products. It includes SWOT, which compares strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to build competitor profiles, compare features, map a market, assess threats, or prepare sales battlecards and strategy recommendations.
Why use it?
It turns scattered competitor information into a structured view of market risks, differences, and possible positions.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions Claude Code.

Part of the ork plugin — 111 skills, 38 commands, 36 agents, 32 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to build competitor profiles, compare features, map a market, assess threats, or prepare sales battlecards and strategy recommendations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/competitive-analysis
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill competitive-analysis
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ork, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 111 skills, 38 commands, 36 agents, 32 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for competitive-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/competitive-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/competitive-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/competitive-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/competitive-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for competitive-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/competitive-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/competitive-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 58 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,329 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00058 $0.01329
Opus 5.5 $0.00023 $0.00532
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00266
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00133

Measured 9d ago against content hash c957a99596c1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

competitive-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/ork/skills/competitive-analysis/SKILL.md · 173 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 173 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Competitive Analysis

Frameworks for analyzing competitive position and industry dynamics.

When to Use Porter's vs. SWOT

Framework Use When
Porter's Five Forces Evaluating industry attractiveness; new market entry; strategic positioning
SWOT Internal capability assessment; go/no-go decisions; strategy planning
Competitive Landscape Map Visualizing whitespace; investor decks; positioning against specific competitors
Competitor Profiles Battlecards for sales; feature gap analysis; threat assessment

Use Porter's to understand the structural forces shaping the industry. Use SWOT to assess your specific position within it. Combine both for a complete picture.

Porter's Five Forces Template

## Porter's Five Forces: [Industry/Market]

### 1. Competitive Rivalry — Intensity: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
| Factor | Assessment |
|--------|------------|
| Number of competitors | |
| Industry growth rate | |
| Product differentiation | |
| Exit barriers | |

### 2. Threat of New Entrants — Threat Level: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
| Barrier | Strength |
|---------|----------|
| Economies of scale | |
| Brand loyalty | |
| Capital requirements | |
| Network effects | |
| Switching costs | |

### 3. Bargaining Power of Suppliers — Power: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
[Key suppliers, switching cost, concentration]

### 4. Bargaining Power of Buyers — Power: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
[Price sensitivity, alternatives available, buyer concentration]

### 5. Threat of Substitutes — Threat: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
[Alternative ways customers solve the same problem]

### Overall Industry Attractiveness: X/10
[Summary: which forces are most significant and why]

SWOT Analysis

+-------------------------+-------------------------+
|       STRENGTHS         |       WEAKNESSES        |
|       (Internal +)      |       (Internal -)      |
| * What we do well       | * Where we lack         |
| * Unique resources      | * Resource gaps         |
| * Competitive advantages| * Capability limits     |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
|      OPPORTUNITIES      |         THREATS         |
|       (External +)      |       (External -)      |
| * Market trends         | * Competitive pressure  |
| * Unmet needs           | * Regulatory changes    |
| * Technology shifts     | * Economic factors      |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+

Read the full file on GitHub · 173 lines

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago Changed · -1 lines c957a99596c1
  2. 17d ago Changed cdbc514a6457
  3. 18d ago Changed · -1 lines acd6e5f349c7
  4. 26d ago Changed 7acba6167f24
  5. 1mo ago First seen · 175 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 6d8c0b70c058

Subscribe to this mod's changes

competitive-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository yonatangross/orchestkit (295 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,329 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.