Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill ork-review-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/ork-review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/ork-review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/ork-review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/ork-review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/ork-review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00291 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00146 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00058 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
ork-review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Ork Review PR
Stay read-only and review the actual diff in its repository context. Read the applicable instructions, trace changed behavior to its callers and tests, and prioritize correctness, security, data loss, race conditions, backwards compatibility, and evidence gaps over style.
Verify third-party API and configuration claims against the context7 MCP server (resolve-library-id, then query-docs) before reporting or dismissing a finding that turns on library behavior. A wrong recalled signature is how a review invents a bug and how it misses one.
Use one reviewer for a focused diff. For a broad or high-risk PR, fan out independent read-only passes for code-path mapping, risk review, and documentation/API verification; each must return file and line evidence. Prefer ork_reviewer when installed, otherwise use a fresh built-in explorer/reviewer role.
Lead with findings ordered by severity. Every finding needs a concrete location, impact, and a reproduction or reasoning path. If there are no findings, say what was checked and what was not. Do not modify files or approve/merge the PR.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 15 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A fcf55015c448
ork-review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository yonatangross/orchestkit (229 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 291 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cross-review
Verify an implementer's diff with an INDEPENDENT, different-vendor sub-agent (diff plus contract only); turn blocking issues into fix-tasks and loop until clean.
sentinel
CocoSentinel — eight-dimension artifact quality gate. Dimension G evidence pre-gate runs first (deterministic, .
review
Enter the Review phase of CocoBrew. Aggregates findings from Code Quality Advisor, CocoCupper intelligence, spec compliance check, and decision coverage gate. Produces review.md with decision points. Requires developer approval before $ship can proceed.
lean-review
CocoLean diff-scoped over-engineering audit — scans uncommitted git diff and applies five classification tags (delete/stdlib/native/yagni/shrink) to identify unnecessary surface area before commit.
sentinel-approve
CocoSentinel approval — records SHA-bound approval for a previously evaluated artifact. Invoked via $sentinel --approve [file]. Voids automatically if the artifact is modified after approval.
stage-coach
Consume CocoSentinel per-stage external coach requests and produce stage quality scores.