Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Youngmaidainon/Agent-Level-Up --skill building-patch-tuesday-response-processgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Youngmaidainon/Agent-Level-UpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/youngmaidainon/agent-level-up/building-patch-tuesday-response-process)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/youngmaidainon/agent-level-up/building-patch-tuesday-response-process"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/youngmaidainon/agent-level-up/building-patch-tuesday-response-process.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.02176 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00040 | $0.01088 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00435 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00218 |
Grade A, and why
building-patch-tuesday-response-process scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to building-patch-tuesday-response-process — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 228 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Building Patch Tuesday Response Process
Overview
Microsoft releases security updates on the second Tuesday of each month ("Patch Tuesday"), addressing vulnerabilities across Windows, Office, Exchange, SQL Server, Azure services, and other products. In 2025, Microsoft patched over 1,129 vulnerabilities across the year -- an 11.9% increase from 2024 -- making a structured response process critical. The leading risk types include elevation of privilege (49%), remote code execution (34%), and information disclosure (7%). This skill covers building a repeatable Patch Tuesday response workflow from initial advisory review through testing, deployment, and validation.
When to Use
- When deploying or configuring building patch tuesday response process capabilities in your environment
- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
- When building or improving security architecture for this domain
- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation
Prerequisites
- Access to Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) update guide
- Vulnerability management platform (Qualys VMDR, Rapid7, Tenable)
- Patch deployment infrastructure (WSUS, SCCM/MECM, Intune, or third-party)
- Test environment mirroring production configurations
- Change management process (ITIL-based or equivalent)
- Communication channels for cross-team coordination
Core Concepts
Patch Tuesday Timeline
| Day | Activity | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| T+0 (Tuesday 10 AM PT) | Microsoft releases patches and advisories | Microsoft |
| T+0 (Tuesday afternoon) | Security team reviews advisories and triages | Security Ops |
| T+1 (Wednesday) | Qualys/vendor scan signatures updated | VM Platform |
| T+1-T+2 | Emergency patches deployed for zero-days | IT Operations |
| T+2-T+5 | Test patches in staging environment | QA/IT Ops |
| T+5-T+7 | Deploy to Pilot group (5-10% of fleet) | IT Operations |
| T+7-T+14 | Deploy to Production Ring 1 (servers) | IT Operations |
| T+14-T+21 | Deploy to Production Ring 2 (workstations) | IT Operations |
| T+21-T+30 | Validation scanning and compliance reporting | Security Ops |
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 228 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 2b3a73fd360d
building-patch-tuesday-response-process is a skill published in the GitHub repository Youngmaidainon/Agent-Level-Up (3 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 2,176 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to building-patch-tuesday-response-process, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
building-patch-tuesday-response-process
Establish a structured operational process to triage, test, and deploy Microsoft Patch Tuesday security updates within risk-based remediation SLAs.
building-patch-tuesday-response-process
Establish a structured operational process to triage, test, and deploy Microsoft Patch Tuesday security updates within risk-based remediation SLAs.
building-patch-tuesday-response-process
Establish a structured operational process to triage, test, and deploy Microsoft Patch Tuesday security updates within risk-based remediation SLAs.
update-llms
Updates the llms.txt file to reflect changes in documentation. Use when editing repository details or specifications. For creating from scratch, see create-llms.
idea-validator
Structured validation framework that scores product ideas. Use when evaluating problem severity, willingness-to-pay, or founder-market fit. For market intelligence, see market-research.
competitor-analysis
Structured competitor teardown skill. Use when scraping competitor sites, extracting pricing/features/positioning, or analyzing strategic gaps. For general research, see market-research.