Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Youngmaidainon/Agent-Level-Up --skill building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-systemgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Youngmaidainon/Agent-Level-UpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/youngmaidainon/agent-level-up/building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/youngmaidainon/agent-level-up/building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/youngmaidainon/agent-level-up/building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/youngmaidainon/agent-level-up/building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/youngmaidainon/agent-level-up/building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.01539 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00770 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00308 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 184 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Building Vulnerability Exception Tracking System
Overview
A vulnerability exception tracking system manages cases where vulnerabilities cannot be remediated within SLA timelines. It provides structured workflows for requesting exceptions, documenting compensating controls, obtaining risk acceptance approvals, and automatically expiring exceptions when their validity period ends. This ensures organizations maintain visibility into accepted risks while complying with frameworks like PCI DSS, SOC 2, and NIST CSF.
When to Use
- When deploying or configuring building vulnerability exception tracking system capabilities in your environment
- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
- When building or improving security architecture for this domain
- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation
Prerequisites
- Python 3.9+ with
flask,sqlalchemy,requests,jinja2 - PostgreSQL or SQLite database
- Email/Slack integration for approval notifications
- Vulnerability management platform API (DefectDojo, Qualys, Tenable)
Exception Request Workflow
Exception Categories
| Category | Description | Max Duration | Approver Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remediation Delay | Patch available but deployment blocked | 30 days | Team Lead + Security |
| No Fix Available | Vendor has not released a patch | 90 days | Security Director |
| Business Critical | System cannot be patched without outage | 60 days | VP Engineering + CISO |
| False Positive | Finding is not a real vulnerability | Permanent | Security Analyst |
| Compensating Control | Alternative mitigation in place | 180 days | Security Architect |
Required Fields for Exception Request
exception_schema = {
"cve_id": "CVE-2024-XXXX",
"finding_id": "unique-finding-reference",
"asset_hostname": "prod-db-01.corp.local",
"severity": "high",
"cvss_score": 8.1,
"category": "remediation_delay",
"justification": "Database upgrade required before patch can be applied",
"compensating_controls": [
"WAF rule blocking exploit pattern deployed",
"Network segmentation restricting access to trusted VLANs only",
"Enhanced monitoring via Splunk alert for exploitation indicators"
],
"requested_expiration": "2024-06-15",
"requestor_email": "[email protected]",
"approver_emails": ["[email protected]", "[email protected]"],
"risk_rating": "medium",
}
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 184 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 2a040338e3ec
building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system is a skill published in the GitHub repository Youngmaidainon/Agent-Level-Up (3 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,539 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system
Build a vulnerability exception and risk acceptance tracking system with approval workflows, compensating controls documentation, and expiration management.
building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system
Build a vulnerability exception and risk acceptance tracking system with approval workflows, compensating controls documentation, and expiration management.
building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system
Build a vulnerability exception and risk acceptance tracking system with approval workflows, compensating controls documentation, and expiration management.
conductor-status
Display project status, active tracks, and next actions.
nx-workspace-patterns
Configure and optimize Nx monorepo workspaces. Use when setting up Nx, configuring project boundaries, optimizing build caching, or implementing affected commands.
conductor-new-track
Create a new track with specification and phased implementation plan.