Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Youngmaidainon/Agent-Level-Up --skill caveman-managegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Youngmaidainon/Agent-Level-UpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/youngmaidainon/agent-level-up/caveman-manage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/youngmaidainon/agent-level-up/caveman-manage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/youngmaidainon/agent-level-up/caveman-manage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/youngmaidainon/agent-level-up/caveman-manage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/youngmaidainon/agent-level-up/caveman-manage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.00888 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00444 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
caveman-manage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- caveman-manage — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Manage eval-gated experiments
Treat every lifecycle change as a production control action. Read current state and results, then report one supported recommendation or block. Current agent MCP is intentionally read-only: control-api does not yet enforce a complete lifecycle transition table and evidence gate atomically.
Non-negotiable gates
- A request to review, inspect, explain, or recommend authorizes reads only.
- Never approve an experiment whose results are pending, whose required guardrails are absent, or whose evidence reports a breach.
- Never convert experiment lift into
verified_savings. Only active real traffic plus provider-causal, provider-complete ledger evidence can do that. - Never supply an organization id. Project and tenant scope come from the logged-in Caveman identity and server RBAC.
- Never execute a lifecycle mutation, even after user approval. Exact
<action>:<experiment_id>strings are agent-generatable and are not proof of human intent. - Unknown states and server errors fail closed. Report exact
cave_snake_code.
Step 1 — Load project and experiment
Prefer MCP:
caveman_context {}
caveman_experiment_get {"action":"get","experiment_id":"<id>"}
caveman_experiment_get {"action":"results","experiment_id":"<id>"}
Use {"action":"list"} when the user has not named an id.
CLI fallback:
caveman cloud experiments list
caveman cloud experiments show <id>
caveman cloud experiments results <id>
Stop if login, project, experiment, or results are unavailable.
Step 2 — Evaluate evidence
Report:
- current lifecycle state and safety class;
- control and candidate sample sizes;
- quality or eval result;
- latency, error, cost, retry, drop, and escalation guardrails when present;
- evidence cost;
- rollback or hold reason;
- whether result is pending, failed, promotable, or active.
Absence is not a pass. If a required field is absent, state
evidence incomplete and do not propose approval.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 115 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 487554bc7e66
caveman-manage is a skill published in the GitHub repository Youngmaidainon/Agent-Level-Up (3 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 888 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
nx-workspace-patterns
Configure and optimize Nx monorepo workspaces. Use when setting up Nx, configuring project boundaries, optimizing build caching, or implementing affected commands.
conductor-status
Display project status, active tracks, and next actions.
framework-migration-legacy-modernize
Orchestrate a comprehensive legacy system modernization using the strangler fig pattern, enabling gradual replacement of outdated components while maintaining continuous business operations through ex.
customer-support
Elite AI-powered customer support specialist mastering conversational AI, automated ticketing, sentiment analysis, and omnichannel support experiences. Integrates modern support tools, chatbot platforms, and CX optimization with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for comprehensive customer experience management.
full-stack-orchestration-full-stack-feature
Use when working with full stack orchestration full stack feature.
multi-platform-apps-multi-platform
Build and deploy the same feature consistently across web, mobile, and desktop platforms using API-first architecture and parallel implementation strategies.