product-feedback-sim

product-feedback-sim is a skill for Claude Code from Yrzhe/claude-skills. It costs 91 tokens per session (815 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A tool for collecting structured opinions from simulated target users about a product, feature, price, or piece of writing. It can compare several versions and show how strongly each is preferred.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to compare product or copy variations, estimate reactions from a chosen audience, and find which version performs better against a stated goal.
Why use it?
It gives you a consistent way to explore how different types of users might react before release. It helps reveal disagreement between user groups instead of reducing feedback to one average opinion.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; positional $N argument.

Part of the persona-sim plugin — 4 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to compare product or copy variations, estimate reactions from a chosen audience, and find which version performs better against a stated goal.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/yrzhe/claude-skills/product-feedback-sim
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Yrzhe/claude-skills --skill product-feedback-sim
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yrzhe/claude-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install persona-sim, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for product-feedback-sim

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yrzhe/claude-skills/product-feedback-sim/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yrzhe/claude-skills/product-feedback-sim)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yrzhe/claude-skills/product-feedback-sim"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yrzhe/claude-skills/product-feedback-sim/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for product-feedback-sim

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yrzhe/claude-skills/product-feedback-sim"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yrzhe/claude-skills/product-feedback-sim.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 91 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 815 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00091 $0.00815
Opus 5 $0.00046 $0.00407
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00163
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00081

Measured 11d ago against content hash 91b49c72708b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

product-feedback-sim scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/persona-sim/skills/product-feedback-sim/SKILL.md · 73 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Product Feedback Sim

Thin scenario wrapper around persona-sim. Runs SGO on a product/copy candidate against a target user panel.

Recipe

import sys
sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__('pathlib').Path.home() / '.claude/skills/persona-sim'))
from lib import sampler, sim_engine

# 1. Define target audience
panel = sampler.sample_personas(
    n=30,                                              # 30-50 is cost-effective
    filters={"occupation_isco": "software", "age": (25, 50)},  # substring match on occupation
    source="nemotron_usa",
    mode="stream",
)

# 2. Single-version feedback (fast)
base = sim_engine.panel_score(
    panel,
    target="<your product/copy/feature description>",
    goal="<what you want to maximize, e.g. paid conversions>",
)
# → aggregate.histogram / median / iqr / disagreement_flag / by_age / by_gender

# 3. A/B (or N-way) gradient ranking — uses anchored counterfactuals on persuadable middle
ranked = sim_engine.sgo(
    panel,
    target="<original version>",
    candidates=["variant A", "variant B", "variant C"],
    goal="<same goal>",
)
# → ranking: [{"candidate", "avg_score_lift", "n_probed"}, ...]  sorted descending

Decision rules

  • Use panel_score only when you want to understand a single version (no alternatives yet).
  • Use sgo ONLY when there's a persuadable middle (score 4-7). If base median is ≤3 or ≥8, SGO has no signal — iterate on the base version first.
  • n=30 minimum for stable distribution; n=50-100 if you need tight CIs.
  • Always expose disagreement_flag to the user — high-variance results are signal, not noise.
  • Always prepend the disclaimer from result["warning"] when showing output.

Target selection guidance

If the user says "我的产品用户是 X":

User type Filter expression
软件开发者 {"occupation_isco": "software"}
企业决策者 {"occupation_isco": "manager", "age": (35, 60)}
Gen Z {"age": (18, 27)}
大城市高收入 {"region": ["NY","CA","MA","WA"], "age": (28, 50)}
老年人医疗产品 {"age": (65, 100), "adults_only": False}(覆盖默认的成人限制无需)

Read the full file on GitHub · 73 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 73 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 91b49c72708b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

product-feedback-sim is a skill published in the GitHub repository Yrzhe/claude-skills (33 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 815 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens