Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Yrzhe/claude-skills --skill vote-predictgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yrzhe/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yrzhe/claude-skills/vote-predict)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yrzhe/claude-skills/vote-predict"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yrzhe/claude-skills/vote-predict/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yrzhe/claude-skills/vote-predict"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yrzhe/claude-skills/vote-predict.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.00856 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00428 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
vote-predict scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Vote Predict
Thin scenario wrapper for opinion/vote simulation. Unlike product-feedback which scores 1-10, vote-predict uses categorical choices and post-stratification so the distribution maps to population-level prediction.
Recipe
import sys, json
sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__('pathlib').Path.home() / '.claude/skills/persona-sim'))
from lib import sampler, ipf, aggregator
from lib.sim_engine import SYSTEM_PROMPT, _persona_card
from lib.llm_router import generate
# 1. Sample a large panel (census-matched after IPF)
panel = sampler.sample_personas(n=100, source="nemotron_usa", mode="stream")
# 2. Compute IPF weights to match target population marginals
weights = ipf.ipf_weights(
panel,
targets={
"age": {"<25": 0.12, "25-39": 0.26, "40-59": 0.33, "60+": 0.29}, # US adult
"gender": {"male": 0.49, "female": 0.51},
},
bucketers={"gender": lambda x: x.strip().lower() if isinstance(x, str) else None},
)
# 3. Ask each persona the question
def ask(persona, question, options):
task = (f"{question}\nChoose ONE of: {options}.\n"
f'Respond JSON: {{"vote": "<choice>"}}')
resp = generate(system=SYSTEM_PROMPT, persona_card=_persona_card(persona),
task=task, tier="default", max_tokens=100)
# parse JSON (see eval/run_eval._parse_json_answer)
...
# 4. Aggregate with weights
# Option-wise: weighted_share[option] = sum(weights[i] for i where vote[i]==option) / sum(weights)
Core rules
- NEVER output a single "winner" percentage as the answer. Output the full distribution + margin of uncertainty.
- Always apply IPF weights when the base panel doesn't match the target population (almost always for Nemotron).
- Report segment breakdowns (age × vote, education × vote) — even if the topline says 52/48, the story is in the segments.
- Attach bias audit warning from
lib/bias_audit.py— humans show acquiescence and framing biases that LLM personas do not. Flag the prediction as "LLM-synthetic, not a replacement for real polling". - Flag multi-modal results — if
aggregator._dip_test_proxysays multi-modal, the population is split and averaging misleads.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 68 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A b551d924bbe1
vote-predict is a skill published in the GitHub repository Yrzhe/claude-skills (33 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 856 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…