Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ytunahankskn/oh-meine-excode --skill team-modegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ytunahankskn/oh-meine-excodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ytunahankskn/oh-meine-excode/team-mode)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ytunahankskn/oh-meine-excode/team-mode"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ytunahankskn/oh-meine-excode/team-mode/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ytunahankskn/oh-meine-excode/team-mode"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ytunahankskn/oh-meine-excode/team-mode.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00663 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00331 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
team-mode scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Team Mode
Use this skill when the user explicitly wants a team, squad, multiple agents, or a staged multi-step workflow.
This skill adapts the spirit of OMC team orchestration to Codex:
- no custom runtime
- no fake task system
- real Codex subagents with clear ownership and staged handoffs
Default Squad
Default to a 3-agent structure when the task is large enough to benefit:
explorer: maps the codebase, conventions, and likely risksworker: owns the main implementation slicereviewer: runs a second-pass verification or review
The main agent remains the orchestrator and integrator.
Drop to 2 agents for small tasks. Go beyond 3 only when the work can be cleanly partitioned into disjoint slices.
Pipeline
Run work in this order:
plan -> execute -> verify -> fix -> verify
Repeat the execute/fix/verify loop until:
- acceptance checks pass, or
- the work is blocked by a real external dependency, or
- repeated failures show a fundamental issue that should be surfaced
Stage Rules
1. Plan
- Read the critical path locally first.
- If the codebase is unclear, spawn an
explorer. - If the task is large or ambiguous, spawn one
defaultsubagent as a planner or architect reviewer. - Produce a short execution plan with explicit ownership boundaries.
2. Execute
- Keep shared glue or the most blocking slice local.
- Spawn
workeragents only for disjoint file or module scopes. - Give every worker a bounded deliverable and ownership area.
3. Verify
- Review locally first.
- Prefer a dedicated reviewer pass for medium or large tasks.
- Spawn an
explorerordefaultsubagent for a second-pass check when risk or scope justifies it. - Run tests, typecheck, lint, or build commands where available.
4. Fix
- Convert failed checks or review findings into explicit follow-up tasks.
- Fix locally or delegate another bounded patch.
- Re-run verification after changes.
Worker Prompt Expectations
Every worker prompt should say:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 106 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 8005357b9f67
team-mode is a skill published in the GitHub repository ytunahankskn/oh-meine-excode (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 663 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
windows-appshot
Use when the user invokes $windows-appshot or asks to create a Windows appshot bundle, including foreground-window screenshots, UI Automation text, metadata.json, prompt.md, or appshots generated by scripts/New-Appshot.ps1.
stss
Reduce defensive disclaimers, stacked hedging, and self-protective narration in proposals and decision-facing writing. Use when the user asks to rewrite or audit a proposal, plan, research contribution, executive summary, or similar text for directness. Do not use for ordinary code work or unrelated prose.
compact-kb
Use only when user explicitly invokes $compact-kb.
boss-briefing
Vault health check — workflow pattern analysis, profile sync, session gap recovery, persona rule proposals.
gstack-sprint
3-Phase Sprint workflow — design → execute → review with user interaction at decision points.
codexkit-repository-maintenance
Use when maintaining or improving the GameStudio-CodexKIT source repository, including CI, governance, catalog, generators, adapters, packaging, documentation, versioning, or release readiness.