Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to yuanlang12/Kite. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yuanlang12/Kite/main/.claude/skills/verify/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yuanlang12/KiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yuanlang12/kite/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yuanlang12/kite/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yuanlang12/kite/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yuanlang12/kite/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yuanlang12/kite/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00117 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00047 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00023 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run the following commands in sequence to verify the project:
bun typecheck && bun test
If errors are found:
- Read each error carefully — note the file path and line number
- Fix the type errors or failing tests in the source files
- Re-run
bun typecheck && bun testto confirm all errors are resolved - Report what was fixed
If no errors: report "All clear — type check and tests passed."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 19 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A a1501c0ab78a
verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository yuanlang12/Kite (19 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 117 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
llm-as-judge-evaluation
Evaluate LLM outputs using frontier models as judges. Use for pairwise model comparison, quality scoring with custom rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines. Covers position bias mitigation, statistical significance, and generating preference data for DPO/RLHF.
reproduce
Reproduces a paper's result, a claim, an artifact or a previous run with the target and success criterion frozen first, the canonical code path run before any substitute, exact inputs, environment, seeds and commands captured, and a verdict from a fixed set, reproduced, reproduced within tolerance, partially…
acceptance-checks
Turns the acceptance criteria a task states into executable checks and runs them against the finished outputs before delivering, rather than trusting that a correct-looking analysis satisfies them; rehearses the hidden condition when the grader scores unseen instances from a described family; treats a stated formula…
submitted-code
Writes code that survives being re-executed by someone else on inputs you never saw, targeting the grader's or collaborator's runtime rather than your own, with one self-contained entry point using only the libraries the specification names, no reliance on packages you installed or files you cached during development…
safe-extraction
Apply when extracting code from a large monolith file into submodules. Covers barrel re-exports, internals DI seam proxy patterns, CI invariant allowlist updates, and cross-file test verification. Prevents CI failures, broken imports, and test regressions from code extraction.
safe-rename
Workflow for safely renaming symbols (functions, types, classes, interfaces, constants, variables) across a codebase. Uses repomap, batchsymbols, and buildcheck to ensure every consumer is updated and nothing breaks.