Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Yugpat1835/awesome-copilot-cowork-skills --skill works-council-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yugpat1835/awesome-copilot-cowork-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yugpat1835/awesome-copilot-cowork-skills/works-council-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yugpat1835/awesome-copilot-cowork-skills/works-council-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yugpat1835/awesome-copilot-cowork-skills/works-council-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yugpat1835/awesome-copilot-cowork-skills/works-council-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yugpat1835/awesome-copilot-cowork-skills/works-council-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.02133 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.01066 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00427 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00213 |
Grade A, and why
works-council-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0
The repository is licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 81 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A aa3d684b680a
works-council-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Yugpat1835/awesome-copilot-cowork-skills (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 2,133 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
general-counsel-reviewer
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a General Counsel archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, legal risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a legal review, a general counsel pressure-test of a document…
procurement-reviewer
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or vendor contract in character as a Head of Procurement archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, commercial risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a procurement review, a commercial or…
contract-review-pack
Abstracts one contract into a key-terms table, compares each term against the user's own playbook of standard positions, and produces a DRAFT contract review pack with a deviations and issues list, open questions and a reviewer checklist. Flags governing law and never gives legal advice, interpretation, or…
dpia-draft-pack
Reads a project or processing description and produces a DRAFT DPIA pack — processing description, necessity and proportionality questions, a risk table with rating cells left blank, mitigations to consider, and open questions. Never rates risk, determines the lawful basis, or judges adequacy; the DPO assesses and…
controls-gap-pack
Reads a requirement, regulation, or policy and the organisation's control descriptions, then produces a DRAFT controls-and-gap pack — the requirement broken into obligations, mapped controls, apparent coverage, gaps, and actions to assess. Never concludes compliance or that a control is effective; control owners and…
export-review-pack
Reads a transaction or order description and produces a DRAFT export review pack — a parties-to-screen list and checklist, a classification worksheet, a red-flag review, and licence-determination questions — to prepare an export-control review. Never classifies, screens, clears, or decides a licence; trade compliance…