Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yunsii/wezdecknpx agentmods add skills/yunsii/wezdeck/task-ledgerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yunsii/wezdeck/task-ledger)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yunsii/wezdeck/task-ledger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yunsii/wezdeck/task-ledger/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yunsii/wezdeck/task-ledger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yunsii/wezdeck/task-ledger.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01999 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00800 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00400 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00200 |
Grade A, and why
task-ledger scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Development task ledger (Feishu Base)
Hard rules
- Development tasks must target an allowlisted root for the active
agent (see Path guard /
tasks-allowlist.json). main → wezdeck|team-repo; pm → FE1 (ops). Do not hard-code another machine's/home/...in commits. - If the user asks for another repo: do not
opena ledger row as accepted work; refuse and explain allowlist policy. - When accepted, time loop must close:
open→ (user confirms plan/初评/开发方式) →confirmif--confirm-required 1→ work →closeclose --status donefails if still 需确认 and neverconfirmedcancelled/blocked/failedmay close without confirm
- Never write secrets into the ledger.
- Final reply must include
task_id. - If CLI fails, say so; do not invent
task_id. - When the request has a clear 需求提出人 (product / user who asked):
record them on open/update with
--requester-id <ou_…>(preferred). Feishu person field name: 需求提出人. Do not leave it blank when known. - Order with worktree:
openfirst; after claw worktree exists,updatecwd/分支; after user confirms 初评+开发方式,confirm; then implement. - Pure Q&A: do not open a row. As soon as the user accepts implementation, open before assess/create (same turn is OK if open is first).
- Test hygiene: after every smoke / CLI self-test that
opens a row,deletethat row (and local index entry). Do not leavesmoke/time-loop/*-testrows in the production Base table. Softcloseis not enough for pure tests — use harddelete.
Path guard
- Config file (authoritative):
~/.openclaw/tasks-allowlist.json(fromopenclaw/config/tasks-allowlist.json.example). - Resolver:
openclaw/scripts/tasks-allowlist.py(show/check/roots). - Agent:
OPENCLAW_TASKS_AGENTor defaultmain(paths come from config, not env). - CLI allowlists local
--cwd/ path-form--repoonly (not remote URLs). - Base field
仓库= https web URL (clickable in Feishu);cwd= local path. CLI rewritesgit@…/ssh://…/….git→https://host/org/repo.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed cff69a049755
- 1mo ago First seen · 146 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 2de85021d824
task-ledger is a skill published in the GitHub repository yunsii/wezdeck (4 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,999 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
paperclip
Use for Paperclip-managed tasks and heartbeats: reading task context, delivering task documents or files, updating completion or blockers, coordinating or delegating work, and following company governance. Includes control plane API operations for assignments, comments, approvals, and routines.
paperclip-task-bridge
Create, comment on, update, and list Paperclip tasks from Hermes using scoped Paperclip API credentials.
gh-file-issue
Use when filing a new Codewhale GitHub issue: turn a bug or idea into a well-formed, actionable issue with repro, acceptance criteria, labels, and milestone.
gh-treasure-hunt
Hunt the issue/PR queue for highest value-over-risk wins: clean focused community PRs, already-implemented issues to close, safe quick-fixes.
issue-triage
Triage Paperclip inbox issues that are stale, blocked, in-review, or assigned-but-not-progressing, and decide a single next action per issue (resume, reassign, unblock, escalate, or close).
review-my-team
Review a connected Paperclip team's agents, tasks, blockers and pending approvals when the user asks for a team summary or what needs attention.