Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yuusakuri/agent-skills --skill test-scenariosgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yuusakuri/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yuusakuri/agent-skills/test-scenarios)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yuusakuri/agent-skills/test-scenarios"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yuusakuri/agent-skills/test-scenarios/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yuusakuri/agent-skills/test-scenarios"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yuusakuri/agent-skills/test-scenarios.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.00715 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00358 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00143 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
test-scenarios scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to test-scenarios — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Scenarios
Create comprehensive test scenarios from user stories with test objectives, starting conditions, user roles, step-by-step test actions, and expected outcomes.
Use when: Writing QA test cases, creating test plans, defining acceptance test scenarios, or validating user story implementations.
Arguments:
$PRODUCT: The product or system name$USER_STORY: The user story to test (title and acceptance criteria)$CONTEXT: Additional testing context or constraints
Step-by-Step Process
- Review the user story and acceptance criteria
- Define test objectives - What specific behavior to validate
- Establish starting conditions - System state, data setup, configurations
- Identify user roles - Who performs the test actions
- Create test steps - Break down interactions step-by-step
- Define expected outcomes - Observable results after each step
- Consider edge cases - Invalid inputs, boundary conditions
- Output detailed test scenarios - Ready for QA execution
Scenario Template
Test Scenario: [Clear scenario name]
Test Objective: [What this test validates]
Starting Conditions:
- [System state required]
- [Data or configuration needed]
- [User setup or permissions]
User Role: [Who performs the test]
Test Steps:
- [First action and its expected result]
- [Second action and observable outcome]
- [Third action and system behavior]
- [Completion action and final state]
Expected Outcomes:
- [Observable result 1]
- [Observable result 2]
- [Observable result 3]
Example Test Scenario
Test Scenario: View Recently Viewed Products on Product Page
Test Objective: Verify that the 'Recently viewed' section displays correctly and excludes the current product.
Starting Conditions:
- User is logged in or has browser history enabled
- User has viewed at least 2 products in the current session
- User is now on a product page different from previously viewed items
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 87 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 2dc10ebb6359
test-scenarios is a skill published in the GitHub repository yuusakuri/agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 715 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to test-scenarios, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
dogfood
Systematically explore and test a mobile app on iOS/Android with agent-device to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to dogfood, QA, exploratory test, find issues, bug hunt, or test this app on mobile.
test-warp-ui
Guides testing Warp UI features and changes using the computer use tool. Use this skill only when computer-use testing was requested (explicit request or accepted offer) and the computeruse tool is available to the agent. Covers launching Warp and verifying UI behavior.
test-electron-app
Drive the real running PostHog Electron app (live tRPC, workspace-server, real data) over CDP with agent-browser. Connect to the running app on port 9222, test desktop changes against a local Django stack, snapshot the accessibility tree, inspect network requests, and screenshot only when explicitly asked. Use when…
pyats-dynamic-test
Generate and execute deterministic pyATS aetest validation scripts - interface state, OSPF neighbors, BGP paths, ping matrices, and custom compliance tests. Use when writing a network test, validating post-change state, running pass/fail checks, or building automated regression tests.
test-loop
Plan, generate, and heal an executable E2E test suite from approved acceptance criteria (web and mobile).
playwright-cli
Automates browser interactions for testing and validating your own web applications using playwright-cli. Use when you need terminal-first browser control for navigation, form filling, screenshots, tracing, bound browser sessions, debugging, or generating Playwright test code. Only use against applications you own or…