Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yxy050208/multisim-mcp --skill multisim-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yxy050208/multisim-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yxy050208/multisim-mcp/multisim-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yxy050208/multisim-mcp/multisim-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yxy050208/multisim-mcp/multisim-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yxy050208/multisim-mcp/multisim-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yxy050208/multisim-mcp/multisim-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.02232 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00893 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00446 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00223 |
Grade A, and why
multisim-circuit-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 175 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Multisim Circuit Workflow
Use the multisim MCP tools in this order. Do not skip pre-validation.
0. Verify the installation
When the installed CLI is accessible, start with:
Get-Command multisim-mcp
multisim-mcp --json doctor
Read full_workflow_ready and each stable checks[].id. Apply the provided
repair instructions instead of repeatedly attempting COM activation. Use
doctor --json --strict only in CI or when a non-zero incomplete-setup status
is useful. Run doctor --json --connect only when the user wants a real COM
and license probe; it may start Multisim.
Preview client configuration when requested:
multisim-mcp config --client claude-desktop --python C:\Python32\python.exe
multisim-mcp config --client codex --python C:\Python32\python.exe
multisim-mcp config --client generic --python C:\Python32\python.exe
Do not write over a live client configuration. Generate a fragment, inspect it, and merge it manually. Keep the MCP server local over stdio.
After the client connects, call runtime_status before the first experiment on
a new installation. Prefer
the high-level run_circuit_experiment tool whenever the requested schematic
uses its supported component subset; it keeps the generated design, Multisim
simulation, exported data, plot, and report tied to one source netlist.
For a new design, use the planning gate before writing a netlist: call
plan_design_options, wait for the user's plan_id/option_id choice, then
call select_design_option, prepare_design_specification, and (after the
specification approval) prepare_netlist_draft. Resolve candidate families
with resolve_component_requirements; once concrete ratings and model
provenance have been reviewed, call approve_component_resolution. That
approval only authorizes a later compiler and never by itself creates SPICE,
files, a schematic, or a simulation.
For the bounded signal-passive template, call compile_executable_netlist next and
show its pin-level CircuitDesign, calculated values, and SPICE preview. Before any
schematic or experiment stage, call approve_executable_netlist with explicit
component/topology/value/SPICE confirmations. This approval only authorizes schematic
planning; it does not authorize file writes, stimuli, analysis commands, or simulation.
To generate the approved schematic, pass the complete compiler response as
executable_netlist, the approval artifact as netlist_approval, and the preview's exact
spice_netlist as netlist to create_schematic_from_netlist; it revalidates the handoff and
rejects changed SPICE text.
Then call approve_simulation_plan with the same preview and netlist approval plus the reviewed
ExperimentSpec (safe commands, measurements, and limits). Pass all three artifacts to
run_verified_circuit_experiment; it revalidates the netlist, commands, and measurement contract
before creating the schematic or starting Multisim.
When the workbench handoff JSON is available, multisim-mcp execute-handoff --handoff <file> --root <project> --json provides a validation-only path; after explicit user confirmation,
add --confirm to execute schematic generation followed by the verified experiment. It rejects
root escapes, mismatched approvals, and existing artifacts by default.
For a long-running handoff, use --submit --confirm after validation; the CLI creates the
approved schematic first and then queues the verified experiment for the durable worker.
For a durable long-running job, pass the same three artifacts and reviewed requirements to
submit_circuit_experiment; the isolated worker persists and revalidates them before execution.
After an approved run, verify the resulting directory.manifest.json through
inspect-project. The manifest should contain only the sanitized approval_provenance
identity, and a workbench result refresh should match its path, integrity, and approval/netlist/
compiled/spec digests before treating it as the current run. Legacy or direct experiments without
that identity remain evidence-only.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +43 lines f0eba91aec64
- 1mo ago First seen · 132 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 637b667fef77
multisim-circuit-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository yxy050208/multisim-mcp (24 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 2,232 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
benchmark-workflow
Run, diagnose, or change Xberg extraction benchmarks, quality scoring, benchmark fixtures, artifact contracts, and independently sourced ground truth. Load for the Benchmarks workflow or benchmark-harness work, not ordinary unit tests.
debugging-table-access-denied
Debugs a TableAccessDeniedError from an error tracking issue, Slack alert, or user report. Use when investigating why HogQL denied a system or warehouse table and whether the occurrence is a real bug or expected behavior. Trigger terms include TableAccessDeniedError, tableaccessdenied, and "You don't have access to…
debug-operator
TRIGGER when operator errors appear or user reports broken behavior. Systematic diagnosis workflow.
frontend-performance
Audit web performance depth beyond Lighthouse. Use when the user asks for a performance audit, Core Web Vitals (CWV) review, bundle-size analysis, or to optimize loading — including slow LCP/FCP/INP/CLS, a heavy JS/CSS bundle, or missing HTTP/2, text compression, browser caching, HSTS, resource hints, service worker…
systematic-debugger
A structured debugging method that finds the confirmed root cause of a software bug before changing code. It uses four phases: reproduce the problem, form hypotheses, isolate the cause, then make a fix and add a regression test.
typescript-testing
Select and run TypeScript SDK verification for packages, examples, type checks, linting, builds, Vitest suites, Effect v4 CLI tests, and runtime E2E tests. Use when adding tests, diagnosing TypeScript CI, choosing a focused test command, validating TypeScript package changes, or writing/porting CLI tests against…