Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zaks-io/skills --skill ziw-triagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zaks-io/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaks-io/skills/ziw-triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaks-io/skills/ziw-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zaks-io/skills/ziw-triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaks-io/skills/ziw-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zaks-io/skills/ziw-triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00645 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00258 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
ziw-triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Triage
Leave the queue with only ready tickets in the ready state, and a named next owner for every other ticket. Terms and labels follow the workflow contract.
Inputs
The repo config and a scope. By default the scope is the intake and ready
states; other states, such as Backlog, only when the user names them.
Steps
-
Run the snapshot for the scope:
node <skill-dir>/../ziw-orchestrate/scripts/tick-snapshot.mjs --repo <owner/repo> \ --linear-team <team> --linear-route-label <route label> \ --linear-states <scope states> > /tmp/triage-snapshot.jsonIf the snapshot fails or skips the tracker, list the scope once with tracker tools instead.
-
Give each ticket one outcome:
- Ready: the body and labels are complete. Move it to the ready state
with
ready-for-agent, even when it is blocked. - To Issues: too big, vague, a container, or missing body sections. Add
needs-infowith the exact gap. - Human: needs a human decision. Add
ready-for-humanand the question. - Leave: in progress, has a PR, a duplicate, or parked outside the requested scope. Orchestrate owns active work; note anything stale for it.
For To Issues and Human, also remove
ready-for-agentand move the ticket to the intake state. - Ready: the body and labels are complete. Move it to the ready state
with
-
Fix metadata the evidence makes obvious: a missing route, kind, or risk label, and blockers stated in a ticket or its spec. Make one combined update per ticket.
-
Rerun the snapshot, then the dependency check, and report its cycles and blockers with the fix or owner for each:
node <skill-dir>/../ziw-orchestrate/scripts/linear-dag-start.mjs /tmp/triage-snapshot.jsonIf you listed tickets with tracker tools, list them again and pass them as a JSON array instead.
Rules
- Read only the tracker, config, cited specs, and script output. Never read code, PRs, or CI to decide scope or order.
- Change only tickets in the requested scope.
- Don't close, cancel, reprioritize, or rewrite scope unless asked.
- If the tracker rate-limits you, stop all tracker calls and report the changes still pending.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · -160 lines · -18 tokens per session 4393b7a31645
- 3d ago Changed · -198 lines 08b4b8ef6b16
- 12d ago Changed · +43 lines 2f3153ee1ca0
- 20d ago Changed · +15 lines 7bbaf88941d7
- 25d ago Changed · +3 lines e71151f97cd6
- 29d ago Changed · -64 lines f8e0e30929bc
- 1mo ago Changed · +24 lines c5b6c0d9a761
- 2mo ago First seen · 406 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 6d985ea77ea7
ziw-triage is a skill published in the GitHub repository zaks-io/skills (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 645 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
jira-issue-create
Create one or more Jira issues through acli from user-approved drafts using heading-based Context, Acceptance criteria, and Engineering notes sections. Use only when explicitly invoked to create Jira issues; use jira-issue-refine when requirements still need refinement.
roadmap-task-deliver
Deliver the first eligible unfinished roadmap task through implementation, review, green CI, PR merge, and a task-status update. Use for autonomous delivery from local roadmap and task files. Files can be outside the code repository or outside Git.
jira-issue-deliver
Autonomously deliver one Jira issue from intake to a ready GitHub pull request. Use only when the user authorizes implementation, commits, pushes, PR state changes, CI remediation, and resolution of requested automated review feedback.
plan-deliver
Autonomously deliver an approved implementation plan to a ready GitHub pull request. Use when the user supplies a plan in the conversation or a file and authorizes implementation, commits, pushes, PR state changes, CI remediation, and resolution of requested automated review feedback; use jira-issue-deliver when the…
jira-issue-refine
Refine one draft or existing Jira issue into a clear, evidence-backed, bounded delivery contract without implementing it. Use when creating or revising an issue before engineering handoff, especially when behavior, repository ownership, acceptance evidence, dependencies, risk, environment needs, or scope remain…
ai-maintainer-copilot
Use when maintaining open-source projects with AI assistance: issue triage, pull request review, release notes, maintainer automation, Codex for OSS application evidence, and privacy or safety guardrails for AI-assisted workflows.