Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Zane456/cc-session-memory --skill ccmcpgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zane456/cc-session-memoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zane456/cc-session-memory/ccmcp)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zane456/cc-session-memory/ccmcp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zane456/cc-session-memory/ccmcp/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zane456/cc-session-memory/ccmcp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zane456/cc-session-memory/ccmcp.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.00317 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00127 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00063 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
ccmcp scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/ccmcp — MCP 使用统计（单命令）
数据源：<cc-session-memory>/memories/skill_usage.jsonl（source=mcp 的记录），cc-session-memory 的 Stop hook 每轮自动记录，长期累积，不受 CC 30 天 transcript 清理影响。
行为（固定，无参数分支）
跑这一条命令，把输出整理给用户：
python3 "<CC_MEMORY_REPO>/memory_system/cli/ccmem.py" mcp-stats
输出即全部记录时间范围的排行：MCP server / 次数 / 首次 / 最近 / top tools（每个 server 内调用最多的 3 个工具）。
输出要求
- 直接给表格 + 一句话总结（总数、最常用、谁在吃灰），不要复述命令本身
数据维护（仅用户提到"数据不全/补一下/回填"时）
... mcp-stats --backfill
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A 63e55a8f6b41
ccmcp is a skill published in the GitHub repository Zane456/cc-session-memory (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 317 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
graphify
Use when the user invokes /graphify or asks to build, update, or query a knowledge graph from a folder of files (code, docs, papers, notes, images). Triggers: 'map this codebase', 'graph my notes', 'what is connected across these files', 'community detection', 'GraphRAG', incremental graph update, Neo4j/SVG/GraphML…
setup-brain
Set up or upgrade an AI-powered Obsidian vault. Interviews you, builds your vault structure (or works with what you already have), creates your CLAUDE.md memory file, installs tools, and gets you journaling — all in one conversation. Also has a repair/upgrade path for existing users.
sunday-review
Use when the user asks for the weekly meta-review or Sunday wrap-up of their week and vault: says /sunday, /sunday-review, 'let's do the weekly review,' 'Sunday review,' 'review my week,' 'weekly retro,' 'week in review,' 'end-of-week review,' or wants journals, patterns, vault health, and stale decisions reviewed…
cierre-de-llamada
Use when a SALES or CLIENT call just ended and the follow-up needs to be produced from its transcript. Triggers: /cierre, "close out this call", "acabo de tener una llamada", "arma el seguimiento", "what's the follow-up on this call", "qué sigue con este cliente", or the user pastes a sales-call transcript. Produces…
note-todos
Use when the user says /note-todos, asks to pull, extract, or file action items or to-dos from a non-meeting note (class notes, book notes, podcast notes, transcripts, panel writeups, strategy docs, action plans), or mentions tasks buried in a note that never reached a to-do list: unfiled checkboxes, orphan action…
patterns
Use when the user says /patterns or mentions the Instinct Engine, says "I keep noticing" or "this keeps coming up", after a weekly review, when a pattern is hardening, or at session end after repeated corrections, 5+ tool-call friction on a routine task, dead-end backtracking, or an undocumented discovery. Also as a…