Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ZaneL1u/cloud-cli-proxy --skill gsd-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZaneL1u/cloud-cli-proxyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zanel1u/cloud-cli-proxy/gsd-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zanel1u/cloud-cli-proxy/gsd-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zanel1u/cloud-cli-proxy/gsd-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zanel1u/cloud-cli-proxy/gsd-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zanel1u/cloud-cli-proxy/gsd-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00845 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00423 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00169 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 76 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 784b518ce66c
gsd-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZaneL1u/cloud-cli-proxy (57 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 845 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-code
Standalone code review for any scope — PR number, branch, file paths, or current changes. Synthesizes intent, runs 10 parallel specialized agents, and presents actionable findings with a verdict. For PR scope, optionally posts the review to GitHub with inline comments.
review-prs
Fetch and present a prioritized summary of all PRs awaiting the current user's review across the relevant projects and provide an interactive workflow helping the user phrase and post inline review comments and overall review decisions.
review-pr-comments-converge
Fetch PR review comments, validate each against the actual code, auto-fix obvious issues, and escalate genuine design decisions. Leaves all changes in the working tree. Use when you want to action reviewer feedback autonomously.
review-converge
Autonomously review and fix the current branch or specified scope in iterative rounds until clean, leaving all changes in the working tree. Escalates only genuine design decisions. Ends with a transparent report of every round, every fix, and anything it couldn't resolve — persisted to .outputs/.
scan-standards
Check whether a codebase upholds its standards — a specific theme or all themes in parallel. Use when asked to review conventions, check standards, or audit codebase health.
use-gh
Posting a comment or review is not reversible the way editing a file is. Every comment creation notifies whoever's watching the PR/issue, and it stays in the timeline even if you fix it a moment later. So a "test comment" to check the command works, followed by a real one, followed by a "sorry, ignore the above" — is…