Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zarpay/rails-template --skill sandi-metz-rulesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zarpay/rails-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zarpay/rails-template/sandi-metz-rules)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zarpay/rails-template/sandi-metz-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zarpay/rails-template/sandi-metz-rules/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zarpay/rails-template/sandi-metz-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zarpay/rails-template/sandi-metz-rules.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00097 | $0.01591 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00796 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00318 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
sandi-metz-rules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 219 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sandi Metz Rules
Overview
This skill helps apply Sandi Metz's four rules for writing maintainable object-oriented code to Ruby codebases. These rules are heuristics that encourage good design practices, making code easier to understand, test, and maintain.
The Four Rules
- Classes can be no longer than 100 lines of code
- Methods can be no longer than 5 lines of code
- Pass no more than 4 parameters into a method
- Controllers can instantiate only one object
When to Use This Skill
Apply this skill when:
- Users explicitly request applying Sandi Metz's rules
- Reviewing Ruby code for maintainability and code quality
- Refactoring existing Ruby code to improve design
- Users ask about "code smells" or improving object-oriented design
- Analyzing Ruby code for complexity or maintainability issues
- Users mention terms like "POODR" or reference Sandi Metz's work
Code Review Workflow
1. Analyze the Code
When reviewing code against Sandi Metz's rules:
Read the reference document: First, load the detailed rules documentation:
Read references/rules.md
Measure accurately:
- For classes: Count lines of actual code (exclude blank lines, comments, class definition, and
endstatements) - For methods: Count lines of actual code (exclude blank lines, comments, method definition, and
endstatements) - For parameters: Count all explicit parameters including keyword arguments (but not
&block) - For controllers: Count object instantiations in each action (excluding finding existing objects)
Identify violations: Scan the codebase for violations of each rule. Use grep or file searching to find classes and methods, then analyze them systematically.
2. Prioritize Issues
Not all violations are equal:
High priority:
- Classes over 200 lines (severe violations)
- Methods over 10 lines (severe violations)
- Methods with 6+ parameters
- Controllers with complex business logic
Medium priority:
- Classes between 100-200 lines
- Methods between 5-10 lines
- Methods with 5 parameters
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 219 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A d993debabbe1
sandi-metz-rules is a skill published in the GitHub repository zarpay/rails-template (9 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 1,591 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ruby-refactor
Ruby refactoring guidelines from community best practices. This skill should be used when refactoring, reviewing, or restructuring Ruby code to improve design, readability, and maintainability. Triggers on tasks involving code smells, method extraction, conditional simplification, coupling reduction, design patterns…
sgcop-setup
A setup guide for adding the sgcop Ruby and Rails code-checking rules to a project. RuboCop is a tool that finds style and quality problems in Ruby code.
gem-docs-review
Harvests offline documentation (README, CHANGELOG, public API) for every gem in a Ruby/Rails project's Gemfile.lock into a local cache, tracks gem versions in a manifest, and refreshes only gems whose version changed. Then reviews a git diff or pull request against that cache to surface (a) gem-upgrade impact …
simplify
Simplifies and refines Ruby on Rails code following 37signals patterns and the One Person Framework philosophy, while preserving exact functionality. Focuses on recently modified code unless instructed otherwise. Use this skill when simplifying or refactoring Rails code, reviewing recently written Rails code for…
code-review
Use when reviewing a Rails PR, diff, or merge request. Ground findings in a real file:line. Trigger words: review PR, code review, review my diff, CR.
gemtracker
Analyze Ruby gem dependencies, vulnerabilities, outdated packages, maintenance health, and insecure gem sources with the gemtracker CLI. Use when asked to audit Ruby gems, check Gemfile.lock security, review dependency health, or run gemtracker.