Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zawlinnnaing/ai-review-cli --skill mr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zawlinnnaing/ai-review-cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zawlinnnaing/ai-review-cli/mr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zawlinnnaing/ai-review-cli/mr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zawlinnnaing/ai-review-cli/mr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zawlinnnaing/ai-review-cli/mr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zawlinnnaing/ai-review-cli/mr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.01226 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00613 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00245 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
ai-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 155 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 2c30c4b6b9ec
ai-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zawlinnnaing/ai-review-cli (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,226 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ralphctl-code-review-and-quality
Multi-phase code-quality skill — primary frame for the evaluator role in Execute, the architecture axis in Plan, and correctness/readability in Refine. Multi-axis code review with severity vocabulary. Use when you are the evaluator assessing a generator's output, and when reviewing any change before signalling…
prereview
Review the current diff against this team's conventions and invariants before it ships. Invoke with /prereview before opening a PR, or run as a pre-push gate.
pr-review-response
Teaches agents to reply to PR review comment threads after fixing issues, making resolutions traceable.
fact-checking
Review and validate claims using counter-hypothesis testing. Use when verifying technical content, checking references, validating API endpoints, or performing quality assurance on deliverables.
umbra-trust-review
Verify AI-generated code before shipping. Run Umbra's Trust Score scan before committing or finishing any coding task, treat findings as blocking issues, and re-scan until clean. Use when finishing a task, before a commit, or when reviewing code written by an agent.
copilot-setup-audit
Audit a repository's Copilot CLI customization setup and suggest improvements. Use when the user wants to review their Copilot configuration, find gaps, validate agents, skills, instructions, hooks, plugins, or MCP setup, or optimize their CLI customization setup.