Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zebbern/agent-collab --skill cursor-result-handlinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zebbern/agent-collabWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zebbern/agent-collab/cursor-result-handling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zebbern/agent-collab/cursor-result-handling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zebbern/agent-collab/cursor-result-handling.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00386 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00193 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
cursor-result-handling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Cursor Result Handling
When the helper returns Cursor output:
- Preserve the helper's verdict, summary, findings, and next steps structure.
- For review output, present findings first and keep them ordered by severity.
- Use the file paths and line numbers exactly as the helper reports them.
- Preserve evidence boundaries. If Cursor marked something as an inference, uncertainty, or follow-up question, keep that distinction.
- Preserve output sections when the prompt asked for them, such as observed facts, inferences, open questions, touched files, or next steps.
- If there are no findings, say that explicitly and keep the residual-risk note brief.
- If Cursor made edits, say so explicitly and list the touched files when the helper provides them.
- When the helper prints a
cursor-agent --resume <chat-id>line, keep it in the response so the user can continue the session natively. - For
cursor:cursor-rescue, do not turn a failed or incomplete Cursor run into a Claude-side implementation attempt. Report the failure and stop. - For
cursor:cursor-rescue, if Cursor was never successfully invoked, do not generate a substitute answer at all. - CRITICAL: After presenting review findings, STOP. Do not make any code changes. Do not fix any issues. You MUST explicitly ask the user which issues, if any, they want fixed before touching a single file. Auto-applying fixes from a review is strictly forbidden, even if the fix is obvious.
- If the helper reports malformed output or a failed Cursor run, include the most actionable stderr lines and stop there instead of guessing.
- If the helper reports that setup or authentication is required, direct the user to
/cursor:setupand do not improvise alternate auth flows.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 23 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 3884c4594895
cursor-result-handling is a skill published in the GitHub repository zebbern/agent-collab (32 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 386 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
team-lead-reference
Provides model routing rules, validates delegation prerequisites, supplies cost tracking templates, defines dead-letter queue formats for Team Lead orchestration. Load when assigning tasks to agents, choosing model tiers, starting delegation session, running multi-agent workflow, delegating work, choosing which model…
vitest-testing
Vitest unit and integration testing patterns, commands, mocking (vi.mock), and coverage. Use when writing .test.ts files, configuring the test runner, or adding coverage thresholds.
orchestration-protocols
Coordinate multiple agents: parallel spawning, health monitoring, circuit breakers, escalation. Use for parallel agents, agent timeouts, fan-out tasks, multi-agent delegation.
typescript-best-practices
Type-level discipline for TypeScript: discriminated unions, branded types, constructive modeling, narrowing hierarchy, exhaustiveness checks, boundary validation. Use when reading or editing any .ts or .tsx file, modelling domain types, or refactoring an as cast out of existing code.
turborepo-monorepo
Configure pipelines, set up local/remote caching, and run scoped tasks in a Turborepo monorepo. Use when you say: 'enable remote caching', 'optimize pipeline inputs/outputs', or 'filter builds to affected packages'.
decomposition
Resolves task dependencies, generates machine-actionable delegation specs, structures phased subtask plans for multi-agent work. Use when writing delegation specs, resolving task dependencies, building phased subtask plans for multi-agent work, assigning work to sub-agents, or partitioning a feature into…