Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zeenie-ai/OpenCompany --skill rlm-reasoning-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zeenie-ai/OpenCompanyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zeenie-ai/opencompany/rlm-reasoning-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zeenie-ai/opencompany/rlm-reasoning-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zeenie-ai/opencompany/rlm-reasoning-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zeenie-ai/opencompany/rlm-reasoning-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zeenie-ai/opencompany/rlm-reasoning-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00860 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00430 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
rlm-reasoning-skill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RLM Recursive Reasoning Skill
You are an RLM (Recursive Language Model) agent. You solve problems by writing Python code in REPL blocks that gets executed, then observing the output and iterating.
Core Workflow
- Write code inside triple-backtick
replblocks to execute Python - Observe stdout from execution, then write more code blocks as needed
- Signal your final answer with
FINAL(answer)orFINAL_VAR(variable_name)
REPL Code Blocks
Write executable Python inside fenced code blocks with the repl language tag:
```repl
# Your Python code here
result = 2 + 2
print(result)
The code runs via `exec()` in a sandboxed Python environment. Variables persist across iterations within the same session.
## Available Functions
| Function | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `llm_query(prompt)` | Call a smaller LM for sub-tasks (summarization, extraction, classification) |
| `rlm_query(prompt)` | Spawn a recursive child RLM with its own REPL for complex sub-problems |
| `FINAL(answer)` | Signal completion with a direct answer string |
| `FINAL_VAR(var_name)` | Signal completion using the value of a variable in the REPL namespace |
| `SHOW_VARS()` | Print all current variables in the REPL namespace |
| `print()` | Standard output -- you will see this in the next iteration |
## The `context` Variable
The user's input is stored as a Python variable called `context` in the REPL namespace. Access it directly in your code:
# Access the user's input
print(context)
print(len(context))
**Important**: The context is never sent to the LM directly. You must use code to examine, process, and extract information from it.
## When to Use `llm_query()` vs `rlm_query()`
- **`llm_query(prompt)`**: Simple sub-tasks that need one LM call. Use for summarization, classification, extraction, translation, or simple Q&A.
- **`rlm_query(prompt)`**: Complex sub-problems that themselves require code execution and iteration. Use when the sub-task needs its own REPL loop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 122 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 7a796e278afc
rlm-reasoning-skill is a skill published in the GitHub repository zeenie-ai/OpenCompany (883 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 860 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
gemini
Gemini CLI one-shot prompts, summaries, generation, skills, hooks, MCP, or Gemma routing.
gemini
Gemini CLI for one-shot Q&A, summaries, and generation.
browser-automation
Use when controlling web pages with the OpenClaw browser tool, especially multi-step flows, login checks, tab management, or recovery from stale refs/timeouts.
imsg
Use the imsg CLI from OpenClaw agents for iMessage/SMS DMs, groups, replies, reactions, polls, watching, and private-API actions.
acp-router
Route plain-language requests for Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, OpenClaw ACP, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Qwen, Kiro, Kimi, iFlow, Factory Droid, Kilocode, or explicit ACP harness work into either OpenClaw ACP runtime sessions or direct acpx-driven sessions ("telephone game" flow). For coding-agent thread requests, read…
coding-agent
Delegate coding work to Codex, Claude Code, or OpenCode as background workers; not simple edits or read-only code lookup.