Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill demand-intakegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkishWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/demand-intake)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/demand-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/demand-intake/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/demand-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/demand-intake.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00925 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00463 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
demand-intake scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/demand-intake
İhtarname taslaklamadan önce yapılandırılmış hazırlık dosyası oluşturur. Çıktı demand-draft tarafından okunacak intake.md dosyasıdır.
Instructions
-
Load
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/CLAUDE.md. -
Run adaptive intake: always ask the core questions; ask strategic block if
--fullor the matter is significant. -
Create a slug from title, counterparty, and date.
-
Write
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/demand-letters/[slug]/intake.md. -
Confirm:
Hazırlık kaydedildi. Hazır olduğunuzda
/litigation-legal:demand-draft [slug]komutunu çalıştırın.
Core Questions
Ask:
- Kim adına ihtar gönderilecek? (müvekkil / şirket / kişi)
- Muhatap kim?
- İlişki nedir? (sözleşme, ticari ilişki, iş ilişkisi, IP, alacak, kira, diğer)
- Tetikleyici olay nedir?
- Talep nedir? (ödeme, aykırılığın giderilmesi, fesih, tecavüzün durdurulması, bilgi/belge, diğer)
- Verilecek süre nedir?
- Hangi deliller var?
- Daha önce yazışma, arabuluculuk veya sulh görüşmesi yapıldı mı?
Posture First
Ask before strategy:
Bu ihtarnamedeki duruş ne olmalı: mücadele, uzlaşma, soruşturma/inceleme, bekle-gör, yoksa yalnızca hak saklama?
Record:
posture: mücadele | uzlaşma | soruşturma | bekle | hak_saklama
Strategic Block
If important or --full, ask:
- Bu ihtar dava veya icra öncesi son adım mı?
- İkrar, ibra, feragat veya zamanaşımı riski var mı?
- Arabuluculuk süreci var mı veya gerekir mi?
- Sulh görüşmeleri gizliliği var mı?
- Muhatap tacir mi? TTK m.18/3 bildirim şekli kontrol edilmeli mi?
- Gönderim yöntemi: noter, KEP, iadeli taahhütlü, e-posta, portal?
- Hangi sonucu almaya çalışıyoruz?
- Karşı tarafın muhtemel cevabı ne?
Intake Template
[AVUKAT ÇALIŞMA ÜRÜNÜ - TASLAK]
# İhtarname Ön Hazırlık: [Title]
**Slug:** [slug]
**Tarih:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Duruş:** [posture]
## Taraflar
**İhtar eden:** [name]
**Muhatap:** [name]
**Vekalet / temsil:** [status]
## Vakıa ve Tetikleyici Olay
[facts with sources]
## Hukuki Dayanak
[contract/statute/general basis; mark verify where needed]
## Talep ve Süre
[requested action and deadline]
## Deliller
- [source]
## Gönderim Yöntemi
[noter / KEP / iadeli taahhütlü / e-posta / other]
## Risk Kapıları
- İkrar riski:
- İbra / feragat riski:
- Zamanaşımı / hak düşürücü süre:
- Arabuluculuk / sulh görüşmeleri:
- Mesleki sır:
## Taslaklama Notları
[tone, constraints, open questions]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 119 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 2e8af44ef464
demand-intake is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish (103 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 925 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…