Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill demand-receivedgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkishWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/demand-received)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/demand-received"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/demand-received/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/demand-received"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/demand-received.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00854 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00342 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
demand-received scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/demand-received
Gelen ihtarnameyi tasnif eder, süre ve riskleri çıkarır, portföy kontrolü yapar, cevap seçenekleri sunar ve gerekiyorsa yeni dosya veya karşı ihtar akışına yönlendirir.
Instructions
- Read the provided incoming document.
- Load
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/matters/_log.yamlif available for portfolio check. - Load
litigation-legal/CLAUDE.mdfor risk calibration and style. - Extract data, deadlines, allegations, legal bases, and requested action.
- Save analysis to
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/inbound/[slug]/analysis.mdif writing is appropriate. - Route based on user choice: open matter, draft response, prepare intake, or monitor.
Workflow
Step 1 - Read the Notice
Extract:
- sender and recipient,
- representatives,
- date on document,
- tebliğ / delivery / KEP timestamp,
- subject,
- alleged facts,
- legal basis,
- requested action,
- deadline,
- attachments,
- notice method.
If delivery date is missing:
Tebliğ veya teslim tarihi doğrulanmadan kesin son gün hesaplanamaz.
Step 2 - Portfolio Check
Search for related:
- same counterparty,
- same contract,
- same IP/brand/product,
- same employment/personnel issue,
- same invoice/payment,
- same court/UYAP file.
Step 3 - Merits Assessment
Classify:
- strong,
- mixed,
- weak,
- insufficient information.
Explain evidence and legal basis separately. Do not dismiss a claim solely because tone is aggressive.
Step 4 - Response Options
Options may include:
- substantive response / objection,
- counter-notice,
- cure / payment / performance,
- negotiation / settlement,
- request documents,
- open matter and investigate,
- no response / monitor, only if legally acceptable.
Step 5 - Deadline Calendar
Record:
deadline:
trigger_date:
source: noter | kep | posta | e-posta | other | unknown
response_deadline:
confidence: high | medium | low
note:
Step 6 - Write Analysis
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 139 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 720082028dad
demand-received is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish (108 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 854 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
terms-of-service
Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
ai-risk-management
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the…