dpa-review

dpa-review is a skill for Claude Code from ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish. It costs 157 tokens per session (2,120 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review workflow for a data-processing agreement (DPA), which is a contract explaining how one party handles another party's personal data. It assesses the parties' roles, security, subcontractors, breaches, deletion, audits, and international transfers under Turkish KVKK practice.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing supplier or customer data-processing agreements and checking controller-processor roles, security duties, subcontractors, audits, and transfer clauses.
Why use it?
It helps identify contract terms that leave privacy, security, breach-response, deletion, or data-transfer responsibilities unclear or too risky.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions CLAUDE.md.

Part of the privacy-legal plugin — 3 skills shipped together

Good fit It is for reviewing supplier or customer data-processing agreements and checking controller-processor roles, security duties, subcontractors, audits, and transfer clauses.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/dpa-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill dpa-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install privacy-legal, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 3 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for dpa-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/dpa-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/dpa-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/dpa-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/dpa-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for dpa-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/dpa-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/dpa-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 157 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,120 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00157 $0.02120
Opus 5 $0.00078 $0.01060
Sonnet 5 $0.00031 $0.00424
Haiku 4.5 $0.00016 $0.00212

Measured 9d ago against content hash 005841aca6ac, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

dpa-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

privacy-legal/skills/dpa-review/SKILL.md · 160 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/dpa-review

Başlamadan

  1. ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/CLAUDE.md dosyasını oku.
  2. ## Veri İşleyen / DPA Playbook, ## Yurt Dışına Aktarım, ## Aydınlatma / Politika Taahhütleri ve ## Çıktı Kuralları bölümlerini yükle.
  3. Profil placeholder ağırlıklıysa önce /privacy-legal:cold-start-interview öner.
  4. references/currency-watch.md dosyasını güncellik kontrol listesi olarak oku.
  5. ## Matter Workspaces açıksa aktif matter'ı yükle; kapalıysa practice-level çalış.

Amaç

Bu skill, DPA'yı yabancı şablon olarak değil, Türkiye'de veri sorumlusu ve veri işleyen ilişkisini düzenleyen sözleşmesel kontrol dokümanı olarak inceler. DPA kısaltması kullanılabilir; çıktı dili "veri işleme sözleşmesi / veri işleyen eki" olmalıdır.

Rolü Belirle

İlk karar şudur:

Durum İnceleme açısı
Biz veri sorumlusuyuz, tedarikçi verimizi işliyor Koruyucu inceleme: talimat, güvenlik, alt işleyen, ihlal, silme-iade, denetim, aktarım
Biz veri işleyeniz, müşteri DPA gönderdi Operasyonel savunma: uygulanabilir talimat, makul denetim, gerçekçi ihlal süresi, sorumluluk sınırı
Rol belirsiz veya karma Önce faaliyet bazında veri sorumlusu/veri işleyen/ortak rol analizi yap; belirsizse hukuk incelemesine gönder

Yanlış rol seçimi bütün önerileri tersine çevirir; belirsizlik varsa tek netleştirme sorusu sor.

Önceki Çıktılar

Aynı tedarikçi, müşteri veya faaliyet için önceki çıktıları kontrol et:

  • use-case-triage sonucu,
  • pia-generation / VKED,
  • önceki dpa-review,
  • politika monitor bulgusu,
  • ihlal veya Kurul/şikayet notu.

Önceki çıktının risk seviyesi tabandır. Kırmızı riskli bir faaliyet DPA incelemesinde açıklamasız yeşile düşürülemez.

KVKK İnceleme Kapıları

Her sözleşmede şu kapıları kontrol et:

Kapı Kontrol
Rol ve taraflar Veri sorumlusu, veri işleyen, alt işleyen ve alıcı rolleri fiili akışla uyumlu mu?
İşleme amacı ve talimat İşleme yalnızca belgelenmiş amaç/talimatla sınırlı mı?
Veri kategorileri Kişisel veri, özel nitelikli veri, çocuk/çalışan/sağlık/biyometri/konum verisi ayrımı var mı?
KVKK m.5/m.6 dayanağı Veri sorumlusu tarafında işleme şartı ve açık rıza ihtiyacı belirlenmiş mi?
Aydınlatma Aydınlatma metni ile DPA kapsamı ve VERBIS/envanter uyumlu mu?
Güvenlik KVKK m.12 teknik/idari tedbirler, erişim, şifreleme, log, yetki, denetim ve olay müdahalesi yeterli mi?
Alt işleyen Alt işleyen listesi, değişiklik bildirimi, itiraz mekanizması ve akış-aşağı yükümlülükleri var mı?
İhlal bildirimi Veri işleyen, veri sorumlusuna gecikmeksizin ve Kurul 72 saat pratiğini destekleyecek hızda bildirim yapıyor mu?
Silme/iade/imha Sözleşme bitiminde iade, silme, imha, yedek dönüş süresi ve tevsik düzenli mi?
Denetim Bağımsız rapor, sertifika, audit hakkı, gizlilik ve maliyet dengesi makul mü?
Yurt dışına aktarım KVKK m.9 mekanizması, standart sözleşme/taahhüt/yeterlilik/istisna, imza ve Kurum bildirimi süreci var mı?
Sorumluluk Veri ihlali, idari para cezası, üçüncü kişi talepleri ve tazminat riskleri kabul edilebilir mi?

Read the full file on GitHub · 160 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 160 lines · 157 tokens per session scan A 005841aca6ac

Subscribe to this mod's changes

dpa-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish (103 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 157 tokens to every session and 2,120 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

regulatory-research-fallback

Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.

HKUDS/OpenSpace · 20 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb

Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 69 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens