Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill internal-investigationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkishWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/internal-investigation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/internal-investigation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/internal-investigation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/internal-investigation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/internal-investigation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.00709 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00354 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
internal-investigation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/internal-investigation
Guardrails
- İddia ve kapsam yazılı tanımlanır.
- Sağlık, disiplin, kamera, e-posta ve özel nitelikli veri için KVKK minimizasyonu yapılır.
- Görüşme notları tarihli ve kaynaklı tutulur; kanaat ile olgu ayrılır.
- Haklı fesih ihtimali varsa öğrenme tarihi ve süre kontrolü kırmızı bayraktır.
- Disiplin/fesih öncesi savunma ve eşit işlem kontrol edilir.
- Dışa gidecek özet iç hukuk değerlendirmesinden ayrılır.
Dosya Yapısı
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/investigations/<slug>/
├── investigation.md
├── evidence-log.md
├── interview-notes.md
├── timeline.md
├── memo.md
└── summaries/
Intake
- Şikayet/olay nedir?
- İlgili kişiler ve roller?
- Olay tarihi, öğrenme tarihi, bildirim kanalı?
- Deliller: e-posta, kamera, Slack/Teams, cihaz, tanık, bordro, rapor?
- Acil tedbir gerekir mi: uzaklaştırma, erişim kapatma, İSG, KVKK ihlali?
- Potansiyel yaptırım: uyarı, disiplin, fesih, eğitim, politika değişikliği?
Memo Formatı
GİZLİ HUKUKİ / İŞ HUKUKU ÇALIŞMA TASLAĞI - HUKUKÇU İNCELEMESİNE TABİDİR
# İç Soruşturma Notu - [Konu]
## Kapsam
## Kronoloji
| Tarih | Olay | Kaynak |
|---|---|---|
## Delil Özeti
| Delil | Ne gösteriyor | Sınır / güvenilirlik |
|---|---|---|
## Görüşme Özeti
| Kişi | Rol | Özet | Çelişki |
|---|---|---|---|
## İş Hukuku Değerlendirmesi
- Disiplin:
- Savunma:
- Fesih/haklı neden:
- Eşit işlem:
- KVKK:
- İSG/regülatör:
## Önerilen Aksiyon
- [aksiyon, sahip, tarih]
Bu Skill Ne Yapmaz
- Çalışana yaptırım uygulamaz.
- Kolluk/savcılık/regülatör bildirimi yapmaz.
- Kamera/e-posta gibi kaynaklara yetkisiz erişim önermez.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 86 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A 1cb39f68c29d
internal-investigation is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish (103 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 709 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…