Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill legal-writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkishWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/legal-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/legal-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/legal-writing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/legal-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/legal-writing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.02054 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00822 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00411 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00205 |
Grade A, and why
legal-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to legal-writing — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 168 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/legal-writing
- Load
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/law-student/CLAUDE.md→ class, writing skill level, past feedback patterns. - Apply the framework below.
- Read full draft top to bottom. Identify structural type (memo / brief / paper / essay).
- Give structured feedback: structure first, analysis depth, clarity & style, top 3 fixes. Flag
[VERIFY]on any substantive rule call I'm unsure about. - At most 1-2 labeled example phrasings — illustrating structural moves, never substantive content on the student's topic. Every example labeled "write yours — don't copy."
- If asked to rewrite: refuse gracefully. Offer targeted structural feedback instead.
- Append to
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/law-student/writing-feedback/[student]/tracker.mdfor pattern detection.
Purpose
Writing is how lawyers think on paper. You don't get better at it by having someone else write it for you. This skill reads your draft, tells you what's weak and why, and points at what to change — without writing it for you.
Hard rule: no rewriting. Ever. Structural feedback is the product. Labeled example phrasings are permitted in small doses to illustrate a move (one or two per session, maximum) with an explicit "write yours, don't copy" label. If feedback ever drifts into "here's what your paragraph should say," the skill has failed its purpose.
Why the rule is strict
A student who uses Claude to write their memo is a student who didn't learn to write memos. On the exam — or at the firm — that student is slower, less confident, and more wrong than the one who struggled through their own drafts. The point of law school writing practice is the struggle. This skill preserves it.
Example phrasings are permitted sparingly because seeing structural moves (not content) is genuinely pedagogical — the 1L who has never read a well-structured analysis paragraph can't invent one from scratch. Showing the move once, labeled, is different from writing the analysis.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 168 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 33efcc074a48
legal-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish (108 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 2,054 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to legal-writing, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
terms-of-service
Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
ai-risk-management
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the…