Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill review-proposalsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkishWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/review-proposals)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/review-proposals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/review-proposals/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/review-proposals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/review-proposals.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00557 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00279 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
review-proposals scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/review-proposals
Playbook-monitor ajanının oluşturduğu bekleyen playbook güncelleme önerilerini tek tek hukukçu onayına sunar. Onay olmadan CLAUDE.md dosyasını değiştirmez.
Instructions
-
Load
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/commercial-legal/playbook-proposals.md. -
If the file is missing or empty, respond:
Bekleyen playbook önerisi yok. Playbook güncel görünüyor.
-
Present proposals one at a time.
-
For each proposal, offer:
- Kabul et,
- Reddet,
- Düzenle,
- Ertele.
-
For Accept/Edit, show the exact diff to
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/commercial-legal/CLAUDE.md. -
Apply only after explicit attorney confirmation.
-
For Reject/Defer, log the decision without modifying the profile.
-
After all proposals are resolved, show summary and archive the proposals file.
Proposal Review Frame
For every proposal, show:
## Öneri [N]
**Madde / konu:** [clause]
**Gözlenen uygulama:** [pattern]
**Mevcut playbook:** [current language]
**Önerilen değişiklik:** [proposed language]
**Destekleyen örnekler:** [deviation entries]
**Risk:** [Turkish-law / business / approval risk]
Seçenekler: Kabul et | Reddet | Düzenle | Ertele
Guardrails
- Do not normalize risky deviations silently.
- If a proposal weakens KVKK, liability, cezai şart (TBK m.179-185), IP/FSEK, foreign law/forum, arabuluculuk/dava şartı checks, damga vergisi review, or signature authority guardrails, label it as high-impact and require attorney confirmation.
- If the proposal is based on one-off strategic exceptions, recommend
RejectorDefer, not automatic revision. - Keep a decision log.
What this skill does not do
- It does not decide playbook policy by itself.
- It does not update
CLAUDE.mdwithout explicit confirmation. - It does not treat repeated bad practice as automatically acceptable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 61 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A e18a6f4dba6e
review-proposals is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish (103 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 557 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…