Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkishnpx agentmods add skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/tabular-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/tabular-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/tabular-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/tabular-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/tabular-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zekaisuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/tabular-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00124 | $0.04175 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.02087 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00835 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00417 |
Grade A, and why
tabular-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to tabular-review — 17 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 243 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/tabular-review
- Load
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/corporate-legal/CLAUDE.md→ diligence structure, thresholds, house format. - Confirm: what documents, what columns, where does the output go.
- Build the typed schema. Write
.review-schema.yaml. Confirm with the user. - Sample run (3–5 docs). Adjust schema. Confirm.
- Fan out — one sub-agent per document, parallel. Each cell: value + state + verbatim quote + location.
- Normalization pass. Flag outliers and inconsistencies.
- Output:
.xlsxor Google Sheets (ask which), plus.csv+_sources.csv+ markdown always. Use the confidential legal draft header from CLAUDE.md## Çıktı kuralları. - Summary: verification workload (counts of not_present / unclear / needs_review per column), flagged columns, where the files are, reminder that every cell is a lead not a finding.
/corporate-legal:tabular-review
/corporate-legal:tabular-review --schema .review-schema.yaml --docs ./vdr/02-Contracts/
/corporate-legal:tabular-review --template ma-diligence
--schema <path>: Use an existing schema file instead of building one. Useful for re-runs and incremental additions.
--template <name>: Start from a template in references/. Currently: ma-diligence.
--docs <path>: Document source. A local folder, a Drive folder ID, or a VDR path. If omitted, asks.
--output <xlsx|gsheets|csv>: Output format. If omitted, asks.
--sample <n>: Sample size for the schema check. Default 5.
Matter context
Matter context. Check ## Matter workspaces in the practice-level CLAUDE.md. If Enabled is ✗ (the default for in-house users), skip the rest of this paragraph — skills use practice-level context and the matter machinery is invisible. If enabled and there is no active matter, ask: "Which matter is this for? Run /corporate-legal:matter-workspace switch <slug> or say practice-level." Load the active matter's matter.md for matter-specific context and overrides. Write outputs to the matter folder at ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/corporate-legal/matters/<matter-slug>/. Never read another matter's files unless Cross-matter context is on.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 243 lines · 124 tokens per session scan A 7fdbd4c431e7
tabular-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish (103 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 124 tokens to every session and 4,175 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to tabular-review, differing in 17 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
przeglad-tabelaryczny
Masowy przegląd wielu dokumentów prawnych (umowy, NDA, umowy najmu, umowy kredytowe, SPA, MSA itp.) przez ekstrakcję ustrukturyzowanych danych do arkusza Excel w prawie polskim. Każdy dokument staje się wierszem; każde pytanie przeglądowe staje się kolumną. Używaj gdy użytkownik chce przeglądać, porównywać lub…
tabellarische-beoordeling
Massale beoordeling van meerdere juridische documenten (contracten, NDA's, huurovereenkomsten, leningsovereenkomsten, SPA's, MSA's, etc.) door extractie van gestructureerde gegevens naar een Excel-spreadsheet naar Nederlands recht. Elk document wordt een rij; elke beoordelingsvraag wordt een kolom. Gebruik wanneer de…
template-create
A workflow for turning an XLSX spreadsheet into a reusable court-document template. It analyzes the spreadsheet and defines the fields that users can fill in.
tabular-review
Tabular review — one row per document, one column per data point, every cell cited to source. Built for M&A diligence ("review these 200 target contracts for change-of-control, assignment, and MAC clauses") but works for any batch review that needs a spreadsheet out the other end. Use when user says "tabular review"…
extract-ballot-tallies-from-voting-report
Ensures a ballot tabulation spreadsheet applies the applicable voting-acceptance threshold to each class independently, logs ballot irregularities with their legal basis and recommended treatment, and models sensitivity scenarios showing whether class results change when irregular ballots are excluded or included.
extract-contracts-to-register
Extract key terms from multiple signed contracts and build a structured XLSX contract register tracking parties, dates, value, and renewal terms.