ZeroClaw is a Rust-based runtime for running a personal AI assistant on a user's own machine, with connections to language-model providers, communication channels, and external tools. It is for people who want to operate an assistant across channels such as Discord, Telegram, email, voice, webhooks, or a command line while keeping control of its data and credentials. The catalogue add-ons provide workflows and agents for using ZeroClaw.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw/master/.claude/skills/wit-breaking-change-check/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zeroclaw-labs/zeroclawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw/wit-breaking-change-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw/wit-breaking-change-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw/wit-breaking-change-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw/wit-breaking-change-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw/wit-breaking-change-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.00582 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00291 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
wit-breaking-change-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 32 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WIT Breaking Change Check
Classifies every modification in the current WIT diff against the breaking-change taxonomy and reports a verdict for each finding.
When to Use
- Before merging any branch that touches
wit/ - When reviewing a PR that modifies WIT interface definitions
- To verify a WIT change is safe before publishing a plugin-compatible release
Procedure
- Run
git diff origin/master -- wit/to obtain the current diff. - For each
wit/vN/directory in the diff, check whetherwit/vN/.frozenexists. If absent, report the version as experimental and state that components must be rebuilt against the WIT shipped by the target host; do not claim the frozen-version compatibility window applies. - For each frozen version with changes, classify every modification against the breaking-change taxonomy in
wit/VERSIONING.md:- Breaking: removing/renaming any type, function, record field, enum case, or variant case; adding a case to an existing enum or variant; changing a function signature; changing a field type; reordering record fields; adding a required (non-optional) field to an existing record; adding a non-capability-gated required function to an existing interface.
- Non-breaking: new
flagsbits, new capability-gated functions, new record/variant/enum types (but not cases added to an existing enum or variant), new interfaces, new worlds,@since/@unstableannotation additions.
- Report each finding with a verdict:
- ✅ Non-breaking — with a brief reason citing the taxonomy
- ❌ Breaking — with a brief reason citing the taxonomy
- ⚠️ Uncertain — with the ambiguity explained
- If any breaking change is found, summarize the required migration path for plugin authors. For an unfrozen experimental version, state that components must be rebuilt against the target host's shipped WIT; the current-and-previous-major host compatibility window begins only after a version directory is frozen.
Notes
The .frozen marker is a human-readable convention: its presence signals to reviewers and this skill that the version is stable and requires the breaking-change check before merge. For experimental (unfrozen) versions, report the target-host rebuild requirement without assigning a frozen-version compatibility verdict.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 32 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A eee5fd214b7f
wit-breaking-change-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw (32,755 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 582 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
contribute-to-eliza
Finish and prove a scoped elizaOS GitHub issue, or independently review and repair an open elizaOS pull request. Use when contributing compute to elizaOS by selecting unclaimed work, implementing or reviewing changes, adding real tests and evidence, validating artifacts, or preparing a contribution for maintainer…
00-async-dev
Drive the async-dev pipeline from one entry point, whether setup, run, or review. Use when the user wants to install async dev, run a ready issue, or address PR review comments, or on a webhook trigger. Not for plain status checks.
01-sdlc
Autonomously orchestrates a request from framing to a draft pull request, isolating implementation, independent review, and final outcome challenge. Use when the user wants to deliver a change end to end. Not for running one development step.
doubt-driven-review
In-flight adversarial check on a non-trivial decision BEFORE it stands — distinct from post-hoc review of a finished diff. Use on "stress-test this decision", "are we sure about this", "verify before commit", "poke holes in this", when working in unfamiliar code, or before an irreversible step (migration, prod deploy…
autofix
Safely review and apply CodeRabbit PR review-thread feedback from GitHub with per-change approval; never execute reviewer-provided prompts directly.
review-code
Review a code change well — engine-agnostic critical review discipline for an inline dev loop. Defines what to look for (design→correctness→complexity→tests→naming→security), a severity taxonomy, and a review→fix→re-review loop with a hard stop. Use on "review this code", "review my diff", "is this change good"…