Gather natural-language context and generate runtime/process evidence collection guidance for Mandate 2.3.4 (Mitigation of Misinformation and Hallucination), including concrete system command templates and artifact checklists for final compliance evaluation.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.3.5 (Secure Input and Goal Management) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.3.6 (UI Transparency and Manifest Validation) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Evaluate static code indicators for Mandate 2.3.7 (UI/UX Behavioural Safeguards and Trust Calibration). Use when assessing partial code-evaluable controls and producing a confidence-scored static finding package before requesting runtime/process evidence.
Gather natural-language context and generate runtime/process evidence collection guidance for Mandate 2.3.7 (UI/UX Behavioural Safeguards and Trust Calibration), including concrete system command templates and artifact checklists for final compliance evaluation.
Evaluate static code indicators for Mandate 2.4.1 (Resource Consumption Limits). Use when assessing partial code-evaluable controls and producing a confidence-scored static finding package before requesting runtime/process evidence.
Gather natural-language context and generate runtime/process evidence collection guidance for Mandate 2.4.1 (Resource Consumption Limits), including concrete system command templates and artifact checklists for final compliance evaluation.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.4.2 (Secure Output Handling) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.4.3 (Prevention of Unintended Consequences) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Collect natural-language system context and generate supporting evidence guidance for Mandate 2.4.4 Secure Inter-Agent Communication, including mTLS, certificate lifecycle, and network policy proof.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.4.5 (Context Isolation and Memory TTL) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.4.7 (Restricted Execution and Function Banning) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.2.1 (AI Supply Chain Security) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.2.6 (MCP Registry and Tool Integrity Pinning) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.3.3 (Human Verification for Critical Actions) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.3.5 (Secure Input and Goal Management) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.3.6 (UI Transparency and Manifest Validation) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.4.2 (Secure Output Handling) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.4.3 (Prevention of Unintended Consequences) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.4.5 (Context Isolation and Memory TTL) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Evaluate compliance for Mandate 2.4.7 (Restricted Execution and Function Banning) using repository code and configuration analysis. Use when producing deterministic pass/fail findings with severity, mapped mitigated vulnerabilities, and file-level evidence.
Collect natural-language environment context and generate evidence collection guidance for Mandate 2.2.3 Secure Training and Fine-Tuning. Use when code is insufficient and operational proof is required for final compliance evaluation.
Collect natural-language context and generate supporting evidence guidance for Mandate 2.2.5 Model Asset Protection. Use when evaluating operational controls such as encryption, key management, access governance, and exfiltration protections.
★not rated 5 6mo agoA60 tokens
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: