Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Zfinix/aster --skill aster-fix-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zfinix/asterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zfinix/aster/aster-fix-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zfinix/aster/aster-fix-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zfinix/aster/aster-fix-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zfinix/aster/aster-fix-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zfinix/aster/aster-fix-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.00530 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00212 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
aster-fix-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review → fix workflow
aster fix takes findings produced by aster review --json and asks the model for concrete edits. It is dry-run by default and only writes with --apply, subject to the permissions block in aster.yaml.
The pipeline
aster review --json > findings.json # 1. review, capture findings
aster fix --findings-json findings.json # 2. dry-run: preview proposed edits
aster fix --findings-json findings.json --apply # 3. write to the working tree
Or as one stream:
aster review --json | aster fix --findings-json - --apply
Rules
- ALWAYS run the dry-run first and read the preview before
--apply. Never jump straight to--applyon findings you have not seen. --applywrites to the working tree only; it never commits. Review the diff withgit diffafterward and commit yourself.- Writes are gated by
permissionsin aster.yaml (mode, plusallow/ask/denyrules). A headless run has no way to answer a prompt, so anything that reachesaskis refused: automation needsmode: editwith explicitallowrules likeEdit(src/**). --jsonemits one JSON array of per-finding results (useful to report which fixes applied, failed, or were skipped).--modeloverrides the fix model (elseASTER_MODEL, else aster.yaml);--repo-root <DIR>sets the root the finding paths are relative to.
Curating findings
aster fix fixes whatever is in the array, so filter first. Findings are JSON; drop low-confidence or out-of-scope entries before fixing, e.g.:
aster review --json | jq '[.[] | select(.confidence >= 0.8)]' | aster fix --findings-json -
After applying
Run the project's tests/build to confirm the fixes hold, then commit. Treat model edits like any other patch: verified, not trusted.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 508c31fc6c0f
aster-fix-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository Zfinix/aster (129 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 530 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
debug-issue
Systematically debug issues using graph-powered code navigation.
md-audit
Read-only code quality audit — scan the current working directory for common issues (bugs, dead code, security hotspots, missing error handling) and return a prioritised findings report. No files are edited. Use when asked to "audit the code", "quick audit", "find issues", "code scan", or "what's wrong with this…
systemic-issue-triage
Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.
issue-root-resolution
Trigger: root audit, atacar la raíz, issue roots, backlog roots, mechanism map, deletion-driven fix, resolver issues de raíz, close outdated issues. Audit and resolve issue clusters by verified root cause.
rdd-defect-workflow
Trigger: RDD, receipt-driven development, review authority, receipt/lineage, correction/recovery, delivery gate/kill switch, bounded review defects. Guide work.
autofix
Review and repair current local changes until they converge, or run Qwen Code Autofix issue and review workflows from GitHub Actions.