aster-review-ci

aster-review-ci is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Zfinix/aster. It costs 75 tokens per session (640 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A code-review tool for running Aster reviews from scripts, continuous integration, GitHub Actions, or another coding agent. Continuous integration automatically checks code when changes are pushed or submitted.

In plain words
What is it for?
For reviewing branches, saved patch files, standard input, or GitHub pull requests; producing JSON or live event output; filtering findings; and posting review comments on pull requests.
Why use it?
It lets automated systems review code changes without opening an interactive terminal, and provides structured results that other tools can process.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit For reviewing branches, saved patch files, standard input, or GitHub pull requests; producing JSON or live event output; filtering findings; and posting review comments on pull requests.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/zfinix/aster/aster-review-ci
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Zfinix/aster --skill aster-review-ci
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zfinix/aster

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for aster-review-ci

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zfinix/aster/aster-review-ci/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zfinix/aster/aster-review-ci)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zfinix/aster/aster-review-ci"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zfinix/aster/aster-review-ci/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for aster-review-ci

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zfinix/aster/aster-review-ci"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zfinix/aster/aster-review-ci.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 75 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 640 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00075 $0.00640
Opus 5 $0.00037 $0.00320
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.00128
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00064

Measured 9d ago against content hash ec0c288d1a6c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

aster-review-ci scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/aster-review-ci/SKILL.md · 60 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Aster review in CI and automation

aster review reads a diff, hypothesizes defects, verifies them against the indexed repo, and reports findings. Everything is flag-driven; nothing requires a terminal.

Picking the diff

aster review                          # current branch vs its base
aster review --range main..HEAD       # explicit git range
aster review --diff changes.patch     # a saved diff file
git diff main... | aster review --diff -   # diff from stdin
aster review --pr 123                 # fetch a GitHub PR's diff

--pr needs a token: --token, else GITHUB_TOKEN, else the one stored by aster login. The repo defaults to the origin remote; override with --repo owner/repo.

Machine-readable output

aster review --json                   # findings as one JSON array
aster review --stream                 # NDJSON progress events, one per line

Use --json in CI and pipe it to aster fix or your own tooling. --stream is for editors and UIs that want live progress. --tui is the interactive browser; never use it headless.

Posting to the PR

aster review --pr 123 --comment       # post findings as inline PR comments

--comment implies --pr. Run it only when you intend to publish; the plain run is read-only.

Scoping and thresholds

aster review -i "src/**/*.rs" -x "**/generated/**" --min-confidence 0.7
  • -i/--include overrides include from aster.yaml; -x/--exclude adds to it. Both repeatable.
  • --min-confidence <0.0-1.0> drops weak findings; falls back to aster.yaml.
  • --no-index skips the symbol index for speed, at the cost of weaker verification. Prefer keeping the index in CI.
  • --repo-root <DIR> points evidence retrieval at a checkout other than the cwd.

Minimal GitHub Actions shape

- run: aster review --pr ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} --comment --json > findings.json
  env:
    GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
    ASTER_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ASTER_API_KEY }}

Read the full file on GitHub · 60 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 60 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A ec0c288d1a6c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

aster-review-ci is a skill published in the GitHub repository Zfinix/aster (77 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 640 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

tech-debt-ci-review

Codex adapter for deep technical-debt and CI-stability audits. Use when asked to find test theater, flaky tests, missing or mis-scoped tests, brittle CI/toolchain behavior, structural debt blocking green PRs, or a remediation order for opencode-swarm.

ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm · 61 tokens

gemini-review

Google Gemini CLI code review with Gemini 2.5 Pro, 1M token context, CI/CD integration.

alinaqi/maggy · 26 tokens

operating-infra

Author, inspect, troubleshoot, and review infrastructure across IaC, Kubernetes, cloud resources, containers, CI/CD, and Linux hosts. Use when changing Terraform/OpenTofu, Kubernetes, Helm, Kustomize, Dockerfiles, GitHub Actions workflow/job/permissions semantics, AWS, GCP, Cloud Run, BigQuery, IAM, logs, instances…

alexei-led/cc-thingz · 119 tokens

factory-ci

CI and pull-request review conventions. One canonical .github/workflows/ci.yml is the merge gate (typecheck, lint, test, build, claude-review); branch protection's required-checks list matches the job list 1:1; anthropics/claude-code-action@v1 reviews every PR against the factory-pitfalls.md checklist as a required…

nonlinear-xyz/factory-kit · 110 tokens

ci-review

Audit CI workflow architecture and effectiveness without modifying it. Use when triggers, jobs, commands, quality gates, caches, artifacts, matrices, permissions, release paths, or deployment automation may be stale, redundant, unsafe, or unjustified.

yarlson/yarstack · 50 tokens

speccrew-dev-review-backend

SpecCrew Backend Code Review Skill. Reviews backend implementation code against system design documents, API contracts, and coding standards. Generates structured review reports with PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL verdict.

charlesmu99/speccrew · 44 tokens