Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill attorney-review-gategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/attorney-review-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/attorney-review-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/attorney-review-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/attorney-review-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/attorney-review-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01258 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00629 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00252 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00126 |
Grade A, and why
Attorney Review Gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Attorney Review Gate
Purpose
Run the final pre-reliance quality gate for draft legal work product. The skill consolidates must-confirm facts, must-confirm law, must-confirm citations, client decision points, ethical/professional-responsibility flags, privilege/confidentiality flags, jurisdiction/deadline flags, and a status of "ready for attorney review" or "not ready for attorney review."
This gate does not approve, certify, or finalize legal work. It organizes the issues a qualified attorney must review before reliance.
Use When
- A high-risk legal output is about to be sent, filed, delivered, or relied upon.
- A draft demand letter, client memo, research summary, risk assessment, contract review, or filing-bound draft needs final attorney-review triage.
- Other quality checks have produced findings that need to be consolidated.
- The user asks whether a draft is ready for attorney review.
Required Inputs
- The complete final draft to gate.
- Source materials, citations, assumptions, and prior quality-check reports if available.
- Intended recipient, use, jurisdiction, governing law, posture, and any deadline context.
- Any client decisions, business positions, or attorney instructions already supplied.
If the draft is missing, stop and request it.
Do Not Use When
- The user wants the agent to approve, sign, send, file, or certify the draft.
- The draft has not been prepared yet.
- The user asks for legal advice or final legal judgment.
Legal Safety Rules
- Produce draft legal work product for attorney review. This is not legal advice.
- A "ready for attorney review" status means ready to be reviewed by an attorney, not ready for reliance or external use.
- Do not check boxes as if acting for the attorney. List items for attorney confirmation.
- Follow
core/source-and-citation-discipline.md; do not invent legal authority, citations, quotations, facts, or deadlines. - Do not resolve legal conclusions, citations, deadlines, or privilege questions by guessing.
- Preserve confidentiality and privilege.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 108 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 16485e07c20d
Attorney Review Gate is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,258 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.