Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill automatic-stay-issue-spottergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/automatic-stay-issue-spotter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/automatic-stay-issue-spotter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/automatic-stay-issue-spotter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/automatic-stay-issue-spotter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/automatic-stay-issue-spotter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01477 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00739 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00295 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00148 |
Grade A, and why
Automatic Stay Issue Spotter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Automatic Stay Issue Spotter
Purpose
Issue-spot automatic stay concerns from user-provided facts into a source-cited stay-risk fact map and action inventory, with escalation flags and verification questions, so a qualified attorney can evaluate the automatic stay. This skill spots issues and organizes facts; it never concludes whether the stay applies or whether an action is permitted. It produces draft legal work product for attorney review — not legal advice.
Use When
- A party needs the automatic stay concerns around an action, communication, or proceeding spotted and organized for an attorney.
- A creditor, lender, landlord, or counterparty is unsure whether a step is affected by a bankruptcy filing and needs the facts mapped.
- Post-petition activity must be inventoried before an attorney evaluates stay exposure.
Required Inputs
- Debtor identity, the user's party role, and case status.
- Petition date if provided, echoed and marked
[deadline verification required]. - The specific actions, communications, or proceedings in question — for example collections, litigation, setoff, foreclosure, repossession, contract termination, payment demands, eviction, lien enforcement, regulatory actions if mentioned, and post-petition communications.
- The timing of each action relative to the petition date, as the user states it.
- Notices received and any responses sent.
- Source documents with citations to docket entries, letters, or pages.
If the debtor, the user's role, or the actions in question are missing, record
them as not provided and return the missing-information list first.
Do Not Use When
- The request is to conclude whether the automatic stay applies, whether an exception applies, or whether an action is permitted.
- The request is to determine whether a stay violation occurred or to advise on a stay-related action.
- The request is for legal advice or a deadline calculation.
Also out of scope (this skill does not): conclude whether the automatic stay applies, whether an exception applies, whether an action is permitted or prohibited, or whether a stay violation has occurred; advise a party to take or avoid action; or constitute legal advice.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 143 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A fa59d6d1d225
Automatic Stay Issue Spotter is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,477 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cross-check-legal-advice
Use AI for legal issue-spotting, plain-language clause explanations, and questions to verify with licensed counsel.
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…