Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill bankruptcy-deadline-tracker-intakegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/bankruptcy-deadline-tracker-intake)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/bankruptcy-deadline-tracker-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/bankruptcy-deadline-tracker-intake/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/bankruptcy-deadline-tracker-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/bankruptcy-deadline-tracker-intake.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01560 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00780 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00312 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00156 |
Grade A, and why
Bankruptcy Deadline Tracker Intake scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bankruptcy Deadline Tracker Intake
Purpose
Intake the bankruptcy dates and notices a user provides into a draft deadline tracker — with the source, responsible party, status, and an uncertainty flag for each entry — so a qualified attorney can verify every date. This skill records and organizes user-supplied dates; it does not calculate, infer, or confirm any deadline. It produces draft legal work product for attorney review — not legal advice.
Use When
- A team needs the bankruptcy dates and notices it has collected organized into a single draft tracker for attorney verification.
- A matter has multiple notices, orders, and hearing dates that must be recorded with sources before an attorney confirms them.
- Internally assigned task deadlines must be tracked alongside court dates.
Required Inputs
- The dates the user provides, each with its source — for example petition date, bar date, meeting dates, objection deadlines, plan and disclosure-statement dates, sale dates, and hearing dates.
- The notices, orders, or docket entries that state those dates.
- The user's party role.
- Internally assigned task deadlines, if any.
- If the user wants a draft computed entry: the rule and the date calculation the user supplies, with an explicit request for a draft tracker entry for attorney verification.
- Source references to docket entries, notices, or pages.
If no dates or sources are provided, record that as not provided and return
the missing-information list first.
Do Not Use When
- The request is to calculate or infer a bar date or any deadline from a rule the user has not supplied.
- The request is to determine which deadlines apply or to confirm a date.
- The request is for legal advice.
Also out of scope (this skill does not): calculate, infer, or confirm a bar date, response deadline, objection deadline, or any other deadline; determine which deadlines apply; or constitute legal advice. It computes a deadline only when the user supplies the rule and the date calculation and asks for a draft tracker entry — and even then the entry is recorded as user-supplied and flagged for attorney verification.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 146 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 7e8a6a3ea4fc
Bankruptcy Deadline Tracker Intake is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,560 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.