Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill bankruptcy-matter-intakegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/bankruptcy-matter-intake)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/bankruptcy-matter-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/bankruptcy-matter-intake/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/bankruptcy-matter-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/bankruptcy-matter-intake.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01570 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00785 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00314 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00157 |
Grade A, and why
Bankruptcy Matter Intake scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bankruptcy Matter Intake
Purpose
Capture the facts of a bankruptcy or restructuring matter into a structured, source-cited working paper — a matter summary, a fact register, risk themes, missing facts, a document request list, and verification questions — so a qualified, licensed attorney can evaluate the matter. This skill organizes facts and spots issues; it determines no legal rights, deadlines, or outcomes. It produces draft legal work product for attorney review — not legal advice.
Use When
- A new bankruptcy, insolvency, or restructuring matter needs structured intake before substantive legal analysis by an attorney.
- A creditor, debtor, buyer, lender, committee, or contract counterparty needs the matter's facts, parties, and posture organized.
- A matter must be routed to the right specialist bankruptcy skill and the issues scoped first.
Required Inputs
- Debtor identity and creditor identity (and other key parties), as available.
- The user's party role and posture (creditor-side, debtor-side, buyer-side, lender-side, committee-side, contract counterparty, or other).
- Case status, and the chapter or case type if known, or
not provided. - Court or jurisdiction if known, or
[verify jurisdiction]. - Petition date if provided, echoed and marked
[deadline verification required]. - Claim type, contract relationship, and any collateral or lien facts.
- Deadlines and notices the user reports, echoed and marked
[deadline verification required]. - Litigation status, payments received, and the action the user is considering.
- Source documents with citations to docket entries, pleadings, or pages.
If the party role, the chapter/case type, or the court is missing, record it as
not provided and return the missing-information list before substantive
intake.
Do Not Use When
- The request is for legal advice, a legal opinion, or a recommendation to take or avoid action.
- The request is to calculate a deadline or bar date, or to determine claim priority, stay applicability, or any legal conclusion.
- The request is to prepare or file a pleading or form.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 144 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A cca2e2ed4b56
Bankruptcy Matter Intake is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,570 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cross-check-legal-advice
Use AI for legal issue-spotting, plain-language clause explanations, and questions to verify with licensed counsel.
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…