Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill claim-chartgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/claim-chart)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/claim-chart"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/claim-chart/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/claim-chart"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/claim-chart.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.03245 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01622 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00649 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00325 |
Grade A, and why
Claim Chart scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Claim Chart
Purpose
Produce a structured, attorney-ready claim chart that maps discrete elements — either limitations of a patent claim or the required elements of a civil cause of action or affirmative defense — against the available evidence or accused features. The chart surfaces what is supported, what is partial, what is disputed, and where gaps remain. It is a draft analytical aid for attorney review, never a filed contention, never a conclusion on infringement or liability, and never a substitute for attorney judgment on any legal question it raises.
Use When
- Counsel needs an element-by-element mapping of patent claim limitations against an accused product, system, or process (infringement analysis) or against prior art (invalidity analysis).
- Counsel needs the required elements of a civil cause of action or affirmative defense mapped against the evidence corpus to identify what is supported and what still needs to be developed.
- A matter is approaching a case-dispositive filing — summary judgment, trial preparation, or a pre-filing infringement analysis — and a structured gap analysis is needed before strategy decisions are made.
- Discovery is closing and counsel needs to audit which elements are evidentially supported and which require additional fact or expert development.
- A party is evaluating whether to assert or defend a claim and needs a preliminary map of the elements against available evidence before making that decision.
Required Inputs
For all modes:
- Matter name and a one-line case theory (e.g., "Plaintiff contends Defendant's product infringes Claim 1; we are defending").
- Mode: patent (infringement or invalidity) or civil (cause of action or affirmative defense).
- Side: asserting or defending.
- Jurisdiction and court. If not provided, insert
[verify jurisdiction]throughout and flag for attorney confirmation before proceeding. - Phase: pleadings / discovery / summary judgment / trial preparation.
- Whether any documents were obtained via discovery or are subject to a protective order or other use restriction — a use-restriction check must be run before mapping begins.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 150 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A e19f4c9054f9
Claim Chart is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 3,245 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
legaltech-expert
Expert in legal technology: contract lifecycle management, e-discovery, AI-assisted legal research, case and matter management, document automation, and compliance tooling. Use when the user mentions legal case or matter management, e-discovery and legal holds, CLM or contract review and obligation tracking, legal…
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…