Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill comfort-backup-request-trackergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/comfort-backup-request-tracker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/comfort-backup-request-tracker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/comfort-backup-request-tracker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/comfort-backup-request-tracker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/comfort-backup-request-tracker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.02539 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.01269 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00508 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00254 |
Grade A, and why
Comfort and Backup Request Tracker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Comfort and Backup Request Tracker
Purpose
Assemble the comfort-letter and backup-request universe for a securities offering — inventorying each factual assertion in the offering document and keying each assertion to its source, requested support, and proposed comfort treatment. The skill records the tracker; the attorney and accountants close each item and decide the comfort treatment. This skill provides draft work product for attorney review only and is not legal advice.
Use When
- A securities offering is being prepared and the deal team needs the comfort-backup universe organized for the accountants and counsel.
- An offering document is in late-stage draft and the comfort-letter scope needs to be agreed.
- A prior comfort-letter scope is being adapted for a follow-on offering and the user needs the assertion-by-assertion inventory refreshed.
Required Inputs
- Jurisdiction and governing law, or
[verify jurisdiction]. - Offering type and structure (IPO / follow-on / shelf / debt / private placement / 144A) supplied by counsel.
- Document set: the offering document (prospectus, prospectus supplement, PPM, OM); financial statements; supporting backup the user has already assembled.
- Accountant identity and engagement-letter posture.
- Comfort-letter type contemplated (full AT-C 215 comfort / limited-procedures / agreed-upon procedures / circle-up backup).
- Pricing and closing dates
[deadline verification required]. - Any non-financial-statement assertion categories the user wants flagged for comfort or alternative support.
If the offering document, financial statements, or accountant identity is missing, stop substantive analysis and return an intake gap list.
Do Not Use When
- The user asks for a conclusion about what level of comfort the accountants can or will provide.
- The user asks for any disclosure to be approved or any assertion to be confirmed.
- The user asks for a full offering-document review (route to
offering-document-disclosure-review). - The user asks for the full closing-checklist workstream (route to
capital-markets-closing-checklist).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 133 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 95abb9a20fea
Comfort and Backup Request Tracker is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 2,539 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.