Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill commercial-lease-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/commercial-lease-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/commercial-lease-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/commercial-lease-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/commercial-lease-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/commercial-lease-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.03634 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01817 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00727 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00363 |
Grade A, and why
Commercial Lease Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 290 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Commercial Lease Review
Purpose
Review a commercial lease from a single, specified party's perspective, spot the business and legal issues that perspective should care about, and organize them into a risk matrix and a prioritized issue list that an attorney can work from. The review condenses a long lease into a navigable set of findings in which every issue traces to a specific clause in the source document.
This skill produces draft work product for attorney review only. It is not legal advice, a recommendation to sign or refuse a lease, or a final negotiating position. The lease itself, and the reviewing attorney's judgment, always control.
Use When
- A user asks to "review this lease," "flag the issues in this lease," "what should we push back on," or "what are the risks in this lease for us."
- A landlord, tenant, guarantor, lender, buyer, seller, or asset manager needs a first-pass issue-spotting review before negotiation, execution, or reliance.
- A lease is being negotiated and the user wants a structured starting point for redlining or a counterparty discussion.
- A lease must be assessed as part of acquisition, financing, or asset-management diligence and the user needs a perspective-specific risk view.
- An in-house team or business owner needs a risk summary before escalating to outside counsel.
Required Inputs
- The full lease, and any amendments — uploaded or pasted. Do not review from a description, a partial excerpt, or a prior summary.
- The party perspective the review is performed for — landlord, tenant, guarantor, lender, buyer, seller, or asset manager. The whole review is from this party's point of view.
- The property type — for example office, retail, industrial, warehouse, ground lease, or mixed-use.
- The transaction posture — for example a new lease being negotiated, a renewal, an amendment, a lease being assumed in an acquisition, or a lease being reviewed for a loan.
- The jurisdiction governing the lease, or an explicit statement that it is unknown.
- The document set — any amendments, side letters, exhibits, guaranties, or related agreements. If the lease references documents that were not provided, note them as missing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 290 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 2f183b5fa680
Commercial Lease Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 3,634 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
cross-check-legal-advice
Use AI for legal issue-spotting, plain-language clause explanations, and questions to verify with licensed counsel.
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…